2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemodynamic aspects of reduced platelet adhesion on bioinspired microstructured surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this geometry differs from that of a plaque. In fact, the shear‐rate gradient of a microstructured surface in the Wenzel state was hypothesized to be even beneficial …”
Section: Discussion On Superhydrophobicity and Platelet Antiadhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this geometry differs from that of a plaque. In fact, the shear‐rate gradient of a microstructured surface in the Wenzel state was hypothesized to be even beneficial …”
Section: Discussion On Superhydrophobicity and Platelet Antiadhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundary layer near an SHB surface has lower shear and a macroscopic slip velocity, which can alter platelet-adhesion dynamics. [32,37,38] 4. Protein adsorption (Figure 3d)…”
Section: Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the height of protrusion, the interspacing area between the protrusion was also reported to be a crucial factor in platelet adhesion (Figure 3). The shear stress difference is lower as the interspacing between the protrusion is reduced [63]. Extreme roughness of the surface (<50 nm), on the contrary, has little influence on platelet adhesion.…”
Section: Antithrombotic Effect Of Superhydrophobic Surfacementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The blood droplet volumes and their CV values were higher than the respective data for droplets generated from DMEM. This may be due to the higher protein concentration of whole blood that supports interactions with the uncoated channel surface (Pham et al 2016).…”
Section: Microfluidic Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%