2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12639-013-0329-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hematological parameters associated with parasitism in pike, Esox lucius caught from Anzali wetland

Abstract: This study involved 120 pike, Esox lucius, captured from Anzali wetland. Parasite fauna were identified in captured fish. Also, changes of haematological parameters were compared both infected and uninfected fish. Parasitological inspections revealed the following infestations: Skin: Lernea cyprinacea, Argulus foliaceus (Crustacean) and Tricodina sp. (Ciliatea). Gill: Dactylogyrus sp. (Digenea) and Tetraonchus monenteron (Monogenea). Eye: Diplostomum spathaceum (Digenea). Gut: Eustrongylides exises, Rhipdocoty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MCV showed an increasing tendency but without any statistical differences in the Small treatment, but there were statistical differences in the Big treatment between 0 and 5 h after infestation, with an increase in MCV values over time. This is in agreement with data obtained for this index in parasitic infections [62]. The absence of MCH and MCHC is also in agreement with the previous data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…MCV showed an increasing tendency but without any statistical differences in the Small treatment, but there were statistical differences in the Big treatment between 0 and 5 h after infestation, with an increase in MCV values over time. This is in agreement with data obtained for this index in parasitic infections [62]. The absence of MCH and MCHC is also in agreement with the previous data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…No significant difference in lymphocyte number was recorded between uninfected and infected fish, and it seems likely that the maseniid parasite did not stimulate lymphocytosis as reported by Movahed, Khara, Ahmadnezhad, and Sayadboorani (). However, Tavares‐Dias, Moraes, and Martins (), Hayatbakhsh et al () and Fallah, Khara, Rohi, and Sayadborani () reported an increased level of lymphocytes in fish with concurrent infections with helminths and protozoans. Similarly, the haematocrit value showed no significant difference between infected and uninfected fish corroborating with Ranzani‐Paiva, Ishikawa, Campos, and Eiras (), Azevedo, Martins, Bozzo, and Moraes (), Tavares‐Dias et al () and Fallah et al (), while Hayatbakhsh et al (), Panjvini, Abarghuei, Khara, and Parashkoh () and Restiannasab, Hemmatzadeh, Khara, and Saljoghi () reported a low level in helminth‐infected fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Tavares‐Dias, Moraes, and Martins (), Hayatbakhsh et al () and Fallah, Khara, Rohi, and Sayadborani () reported an increased level of lymphocytes in fish with concurrent infections with helminths and protozoans. Similarly, the haematocrit value showed no significant difference between infected and uninfected fish corroborating with Ranzani‐Paiva, Ishikawa, Campos, and Eiras (), Azevedo, Martins, Bozzo, and Moraes (), Tavares‐Dias et al () and Fallah et al (), while Hayatbakhsh et al (), Panjvini, Abarghuei, Khara, and Parashkoh () and Restiannasab, Hemmatzadeh, Khara, and Saljoghi () reported a low level in helminth‐infected fish. For leucocrit, insignificant differences indicate the absence of cellular immunity relating to maseniid infection, similar to the observation made for Rutilus rutilus infected with Rhipidocotyle fennica (Jeney, Valtonen, Jeney, & Jokinen, ), while an increased leucocrit value was reported in fishes infected by trematodes (Khurshid & Ahmad, ; Restiannasab et al, ; Shah, Parveen, Mir, Sarwar, & Yousuf, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also it is found in fresh-water marine areas: in bays of the Baltic and Azov seas. In water bodies where no intensive fishing is done, pike can reach up to 180 cm in length (usually length of caught fish is up to 1 meter) and weigh up to 40 kg (usually up to 8 kg) (Crai, 1996). E. lucius lives in areas with slow flow, preferring to keep in thickets of aquatic vegetation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%