2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1478-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hematogenous and lymphatic tumor cell dissemination may be detected in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Abstract: Tumor cell dissemination in bone marrow (BM) and lymph nodes is considered an important step in systemic disease progression and is associated with poor prognosis. Only invasive cancers are assumed to shed isolated tumor cells (ITC) into the bloodstream and infiltrate lymph nodes. However, latest studies indicate that tumor cell dissemination may occur before stroma invasion, i.e., in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of ITC in bone marrow and se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the frequency of DCIS with disseminated tumor cells (25.0%) did not significantly differ from that of invasive breast cancer (19.6 %; p = 0.57). Despite caution should be taken because of the very small sample size in our study, this observation supports previous results of early dissemination and systemic spread already in pre-invasive disease [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Comparison Of Clinical Parameters and Biomarkers Between DCIsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the frequency of DCIS with disseminated tumor cells (25.0%) did not significantly differ from that of invasive breast cancer (19.6 %; p = 0.57). Despite caution should be taken because of the very small sample size in our study, this observation supports previous results of early dissemination and systemic spread already in pre-invasive disease [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Comparison Of Clinical Parameters and Biomarkers Between DCIsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This result seems counterintuitive and sample size is again an issue here. But beside potential technical and statistical issues similar data have been obtained before [18][19][20][21]28] suggesting that profound but undetectable dissemination may occur very early. Our results also hint towards a better prognosis of luminal type tumors both in DCIS and invasive breast cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…However, the incidence of a positive SLN in patients with DCIS has been reported to be 1.1-8.5 % (0-2.8 % for macroscopic nodal disease), which is most likely due to unrecognized underlying invasive carcinoma. 1,8,9,13,25,29 A positive SLN in DCIS has been associated with the presence of a mass and a larger volume of DCIS. 9,13,28 Klauber-DeMore et al 1 examined patients who underwent SLNB for high-risk DCIS, defined as patients with a palpable mass (21 %), mammographic mass (34 %), histology suspicious but not diagnostic for microinvasion (24 %), multicentric disease requiring mastectomy 12 (53 %), or high nuclear grade or non-high nuclear grade with necrosis 12 (72 %).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While metastasis is typically characterized as the final step of primary tumor growth, this study demonstrates that primary tumors and metastatic lesions can develop in parallel rather than in sequence; a hypothesis that is further supported by the fact that DTC status is not correlated to tumor size (Hüsemann et al 2008). This finding was clinically validated by the detection of DTCs in the bone marrow of patients diagnosed only with breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (Sänger et al 2011; Banys et al 2012) or localized Prostate cancer (Melchior et al 1997). …”
Section: Metastatic Dissemination To Bonementioning
confidence: 95%