1999
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.5.10227511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helical CT phlebography of the superior vena cava: diagnosis and evaluation of venous obstruction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…So in the end, pulmonary embolism (PE) remained as the most likely possibility despite the conflicting diagnostic testing results. Although helical (spiral) CT with bilateral upper extremity contrast injection has a reported sensitivity of 98 percent for diagnosing PE [9]; in some studies the sensitivities have ranged from 53 to 87 percent, even for segmental or larger emboli [10-12]. Obviously, the specificity of helical CT scanning depends on reader experience and results must be interpreted with caution, particularly if the clinical probability of pulmonary emboli and the CT results are discordant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So in the end, pulmonary embolism (PE) remained as the most likely possibility despite the conflicting diagnostic testing results. Although helical (spiral) CT with bilateral upper extremity contrast injection has a reported sensitivity of 98 percent for diagnosing PE [9]; in some studies the sensitivities have ranged from 53 to 87 percent, even for segmental or larger emboli [10-12]. Obviously, the specificity of helical CT scanning depends on reader experience and results must be interpreted with caution, particularly if the clinical probability of pulmonary emboli and the CT results are discordant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Venography, however, provided excellent characterisation of the venous anatomy and the site and extent of venous obstruction, necessary for decision-making for the therapeutic strategy. Notwithstanding the limitations of computed tomography in delineating venous anatomy, it is an essential examination to exclude external compression as a cause of SVC syndrome and to characterise the nature of the extrinsic compression [6,16,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of stenosis of the CTV system (Stanford types I and II), care should be taken to avoid the risk of venous obstruction and subsequent SVC syndrome after HC placement. For this reason and in the presence of blood clots, angioplasty and stent are justified [11]. Stent deployment is an established option for benign CTV stenosis [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients were asymptomatic before the procedure regarding CTV obstruction (the Kishi score for clinical signs of superior vena cava [SVC] obstruction was \4 for all patients). Helical CT phlebography using the technique described by Qanadli et al [11] (n = 2) or digital phlebography (n = 11) was done prior to the procedure to evaluate the CTV circulation including stenosis and occlusion evaluation and collateral supply assessment. In one patient, helical CT phlebography failed and a digital phlebography had to be performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%