2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12471-010-0052-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Pacemaker-Induced Superior Vena Cava Syndrome by Balloon Angioplasty and Stenting

Abstract: Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is a rare but serious complication after pacemaker implantation. This report describes three cases of SVC syndrome treated with venoplasty and venous stenting, with an average follow-up of 30.7 (±3.1)months. These cases illustrate that the definitive diagnosis, and the extent and location of venous obstruction, can only be determined by venography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of pacemaker leads associated SVC syndrome, stent placement and balloon venoplasty are viable options. The limitation of traditional balloon venoplasty is a high recurrence rate [9]. Our institution has had limited but favorable outcomes with the use of Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) therapy in juxtacardiac lesions such as recurrent pulmonary venous stenosis [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of pacemaker leads associated SVC syndrome, stent placement and balloon venoplasty are viable options. The limitation of traditional balloon venoplasty is a high recurrence rate [9]. Our institution has had limited but favorable outcomes with the use of Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) therapy in juxtacardiac lesions such as recurrent pulmonary venous stenosis [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Superior vena cava syndrome secondary to pacemaker lead placement is characteristic of patients in whom there is concern about the compromise (and functioning) of pacemaker leads when those leads are adversely affected by stent placement. 3,4 Currently, only a few case reports describe the use of uncovered stents as a treatment option. 3,5 The theory is that the pacemaker wires will be incorporated into the venous wall, thereby obviating any contact with the stent or balloon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These preliminary studies reported excellent acute efficacy and short‐ and midterm primary patency rates (up to 30 months) . The reported complications included a lead fracture and remnant associated with lead extraction and later stent dislocation and occlusion associated with stent deployment . The extraction site with venous access maintained could be used for access for the balloon and stent .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%