2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Height drift correction in non-raster atomic force microscopy

Abstract: We propose a novel method to detect and correct drift in non-raster scanning probe microscopy. In conventional raster scanning drift is usually corrected by subtracting a fitted polynomial from each scan line, but sample tilt or large topographic features can result in severe artifacts. Our method uses self-intersecting scan paths to distinguish drift from topographic features. Observing the height differences when passing the same position at different times enables the reconstruction of a continuous function… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All reported resolutions are based on the gold standard FSC-0.143 criterion 57 and FSC-curves were corrected for the convolution effects of a soft mask using high-resolution noise-substitution 58 in RELION 3.1 as well as in cryoSPARC v3. All reconstructions were sharpened by applying a negative B -factor that was estimated using automated procedures 59 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All reported resolutions are based on the gold standard FSC-0.143 criterion 57 and FSC-curves were corrected for the convolution effects of a soft mask using high-resolution noise-substitution 58 in RELION 3.1 as well as in cryoSPARC v3. All reconstructions were sharpened by applying a negative B -factor that was estimated using automated procedures 59 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be noted that no tilt correction was applied to the presented images. The quality of the data obtained by the rotational scanning could be further improved by applying tilt correction for non-raster scanning trajectories [24] and sensor inpainting [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, constructing a vertically symmetrical AFM instrument is difficult; thus, the vertical drift becomes larger than the horizontal drift. Therefore, several previous studies were aimed at correcting the vertical drift [4,5,11]. The other requirement is that the cross section around the reference profile should be uniform within the area of supposed drift, during the measurement, along the slow-scan axis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) The height drift is corrected using self-intersecting scan paths to distinguish the drift from the surface topography. Observing the height differences when passing the same position at different times enables reconstruction of a continuous function for the drift [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%