2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hedonic and environmental quality: A hybrid model of product differentiation

Abstract: tIn this paper, we analyze how strategic competition between a green firm and a browncompetitor develops when their products are differentiated along two dimensions: hedonicquality and environmental quality. The former dimension refers to the pure (intrinsic) per-formance of the good, whereas the latter dimension has a positional content: buying greengoods satisfies the consumer’s desire to be portrayed as a socially worthy citizen. We con-sider the case in which these quality dimensions are in conflict with e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, firms offer more products with high environmental quality by improving the environmental performance of their products (Mantovani et al,. 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, firms offer more products with high environmental quality by improving the environmental performance of their products (Mantovani et al,. 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this term has been increasingly used to define the pure performance of a good and to differentiate it from its environmental attributes. See Lambertini (2013) and Mantovani et al (2016), inter alia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first case, following most of the literature (e.g., Moraga-Gonzalez and Padron-Fumero, 2002; Lombardini-Riipinen, 2005; Deltas et al ., 2013; Ben Elhadj and Tarola, 2015), we assume that the green good is of high quality and the polluting brown good is of low quality. In the second case, based on the observation that quite often brown goods have higher performance than green alternatives (e.g., Weatherell et al ., 2003; Gupta and Ogden, 2009; Mantovani et al ., 2016), we assume that the high-quality good is the one that pollutes whereas the low-quality good is green.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rationale underlying our analysis is that when buying green goods, consumers get a social satisfaction behind the utility traditionally observed: this satisfaction increases with the quality gap between green and brown products, as this gap determines the relative contribution of green consumers to environment protection and thus their social position among peers. The role of relative preferences for environmental goods are also analysed byMantovani et al, (2016), andMantovani and Vergari, (2017), in a framework where the social content of a green good may be in contrast with its intrinsic performance 8. In Lombardini-Riipinen (2005) this subsidy is however unrelated to the pool of consumers buying one of the two variants existing in the market.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%