Hedging on Betting Markets

Abstract

The possibility to use hedging strategies is an often neglected aspect in the literature on prediction/betting markets, as most papers assume that bettors will bet according to their beliefs about the probability of the outcome of the event, as opposed to the direction in which the odds will move. This ignores strategies that try to buy low and sell high through exploiting price changes, which is an important aspect to incorporate to fully understand market pricing. In this paper, we derive the key mathematical results in using hedging strategies through taking opposite positions to an initial bet after the market odds have changed and show that a profit can be made without explicitly speculating on the probability of the outcomes. We also discuss two sources of inefficiency that can arise when using hedging strategies in practice: (i) the need to pay a fee when using a betting exchange and (ii) the lack of a lay option (the possibility to bet against outcomes) on some markets, and we analyze how they affect the possibilities to hedge. Many of the results have interesting properties when expressed in terms of the naive probabilities implied by the odds.

The Gamblification of Investing: How a New Generation of Investors Is Being Born to Lose

“…This section focuses on the financial products of options, futures, contracts-for-difference (collective known as derivatives), and foreign exchange speculation via high-risk derivatives. These are all products that provide a payoff based on the price of another underlying financial asset, and so can be used to reduce risks for actors with certain liabilities via "hedging" [66]. For example, a wheat farmer can use a future on the price of wheat to guarantee a given income from their end-of-year harvest.…”

Financial inducements in gambling marketing: An information disclosure proposal to inform gamblers of their true economic value

“…Matched betting primarily relates to sports betting, where an operator might for example offer a free $25 bet on a specific team to win an upcoming match, much like Mansion's Pittsburgh Steelers bet. Matched betting would then involve using person-to-person betting markets to make a matching bet with an identical potential payoff on the Pittsburgh Steelers to not win, which like the roulette example above would therefore provide a sure profit of just under $25 for the bettor (Axén & Cortis, 2020). Betting markets are generally used in matched betting, due to their low commissions (their equivalent of the house edge) and the varied types of bets that they enable (Franck et al, 2010).…”

Are Sports Bettors Biased toward Longshots, Favorites, or Both? A Literature Review

“…Therefore, the number of potential outcomes in any given sporting event and the likely range of implied probabilities are predicted to be key factors in whether favorite or longshot biases emerge. Our focus here is on the standard bets that bettors predominantly make to take on risk rather than the few bets sports bettors sometimes make to hedge or reduce risk (Axén and Cortis 2020).…”