2016
DOI: 10.1287/15-ssy206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy-Traffic Limits for a Fork-Join Network in the Halfin-Whitt Regime

Abstract: We study a fork-join network with a single class of jobs, which are forked into a fixed number of parallel tasks upon arrival to be processed at the corresponding multi-server stations. After service completion, each task will join a buffer associated with the service station waiting for synchronization, called “unsynchronized queue”. The synchronization rule requires that all tasks from the same job must be completed, referred to as “non-exchangeable synchronization”. Once synchronized, jobs will leave the sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That requires tracking the status (in service or in the waiting buffer for synchronization) of each task of jobs initially in the system. This approach can be further developed to study fork-join networks with NES in the many-server regimes, for example, the recent development in the Halfin-Whitt regime in [44], where non-empty initial condition is considered for K = 2. It remains open to investigate if our approach can be used to study scheduling and routing control problems in single class or multi-class models with potentially multiple processing stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…That requires tracking the status (in service or in the waiting buffer for synchronization) of each task of jobs initially in the system. This approach can be further developed to study fork-join networks with NES in the many-server regimes, for example, the recent development in the Halfin-Whitt regime in [44], where non-empty initial condition is considered for K = 2. It remains open to investigate if our approach can be used to study scheduling and routing control problems in single class or multi-class models with potentially multiple processing stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We state the proof of the first approach below, and the proof of the second approach in the Appendix B. We think that the techniques developed in the new approach will turn out to be useful to study fork-join networks with NES in the many-server heavy-traffic regimes (see, e.g., [44]). Proof of Lemma 6.2.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are (i) loss networks and (ii) bandwidth sharing networks. For work on fork-join networks, we refer to [100,101,102] A loss network is an extension of the Erlang B model. Consider a telecommunication network with J links, and suppose that link j, j = 1, .…”
Section: Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.1. Literature Review Although there are many studies focusing on performance evaluation of the fork-join networks (see Nguyen [25,26], Thomasian [34] and references therein, Lu and Pang [19,20,21]), there are only a few studies focusing on control of fork-join networks (see Atar et al [4], Pedarsani et al [28,29,30], Özkan and Ward [27]). Atar et al [4] consider the control of a specific fork-join network with probabilistic feedback mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%