1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.82.4761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy Majorana Neutrinos ate+eColliders

Abstract: We investigate possibilities for detecting heavy Majorana neutrinos (N's) in e 1 e 2 at LEP200 and future linear colliders. We concentrate on the processes where the pairs of intermediate heavy N's produce a clear signal of total lepton number violation ͑e 1 e 2 ! NN ! W 1 l 2 W 1 l 02 ͒. Such a signal is not possible if the heavy neutrinos are of Dirac nature. Our approach is general in the sense that the intermediate N's can be either on shell or off shell. Discussion of the relative numerical importance of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eq. (2)] are severely restricted by available experimental data (LEP and low-energy data) [13,14]: 3 In the simpler 1OS and 2OS expressions for |M| 2 , these factors are different. For the 2OS expression, the factor is (1/2) because the two intermediate on-shell N 's are indistinguishable, and thus their decay product pairs (W + ℓ − i , W + ℓ − j ) are also kinematically indistinguishable.…”
Section: Numerical Calculations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eq. (2)] are severely restricted by available experimental data (LEP and low-energy data) [13,14]: 3 In the simpler 1OS and 2OS expressions for |M| 2 , these factors are different. For the 2OS expression, the factor is (1/2) because the two intermediate on-shell N 's are indistinguishable, and thus their decay product pairs (W + ℓ − i , W + ℓ − j ) are also kinematically indistinguishable.…”
Section: Numerical Calculations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second point does not apply in the case of µ − µ + colliders, the case which we therefore do not consider in the present paper. As in the previous paper [3], our analysis is rather general, in the sense that we do not restrict ourselves to any specific (classes of) models. Further, we use basically the same set of programs developed by us there, this time adjusted to the case of eµ colliders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stringent constraint on jR eN j 2 has been set for a mass region from 80 GeV to 205 GeV. Some efforts have been made to study the production and signature of heavy neutrinos in e þ e − or e − e − collision processes with both pair and single heavy neutrino productions, and various neutrino decay chains, lW, νZ and νH [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]; for a review, see [24]. Currently, new electronpositron colliders, such as CEPC, Future Circular Collider (FCC), and International Linear Collider (ILC), are under proposal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide beautiful signatures which can be tested at various collider options. Estimates of the discovery probability for heavy Majorana neutrinos at the LHC were done in [4] and for electron-positron colliders in [5]. An electron-electron collider provides specific and very useful option for Majorana neutrino search, the so called "the inverse double-β decay" process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%