2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy ion irradiation response of an additively manufactured 316LN stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a compositionally graded specimen was used to evaluate the mechanical properties such as radiation damages and irradiation-assisted stress corrosion cracking of AM materials [51]. An AM 316LN austenitic stainless steel with high-density solidification cells was irradiated using 3.5 MeV Fe ion to a peak dose of 220 dpa at 450 °C [52]. The irradiation damage and the irradiationassisted stress corrosion cracking behavior of both proton-irradiated AM and wrought 316L stainless steel were examined with about 4% plastic strain [53].…”
Section: Irradiation Damage Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a compositionally graded specimen was used to evaluate the mechanical properties such as radiation damages and irradiation-assisted stress corrosion cracking of AM materials [51]. An AM 316LN austenitic stainless steel with high-density solidification cells was irradiated using 3.5 MeV Fe ion to a peak dose of 220 dpa at 450 °C [52]. The irradiation damage and the irradiationassisted stress corrosion cracking behavior of both proton-irradiated AM and wrought 316L stainless steel were examined with about 4% plastic strain [53].…”
Section: Irradiation Damage Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, historically accumulated knowledge built on conventional alloy manufacturing, together with recent advances in additive manufacturing, is facilitating breakthroughs, especially in the development of alloys depending sensitively on both chemical disorder and intricately designed microstructures for certain targeted functionalities. Additive manufacturing routes may overcome conventional manufacturing limits by eliminating post-thermomechanical processing and may produce inimitable heterogeneous precipitates, grain structure and morphology, or subgrain solidification cells, as recently demonstrated in additive manufacturing stainless steels. Synergistic effects from valence electrons (i.e., alloying TMs with larger differences in the outermost electron counts); atomic-level disorder (i.e., differences in atomic volume and mass); and inhomogeneity from the nanoscale to the micro-, meso-, and macroscales in complex alloys composed of TMs are key factors to be modified to achieve desirable properties in structural alloys.…”
Section: Chemical Complexity In Action and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they are widely used in modern industries (medical devices, power plants, steamships, and hightemperature bolts). They are also widely used as structural materials in nuclear reactors due to their superior properties [14,15]. In addition, austenitic stainless steels are commonly preferred in the food and biomedical fields due to their excellent biocompatibility compared to other non-austenitic stainless steels [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%