2019
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy Barbell Hip Thrusts Do Not Effect Sprint Performance: An 8-Week Randomized Controlled Study

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of an 8-week barbell hip thrust strength training program on sprint performance. Twenty-one collegiate athletes (15 males and 6 females) were randomly assigned to either an intervention (n = 11, age 27.36 ± 3.17 years, height 169.55 ± 10.38 cm, weight 72.7± 18 kg) or control group (n = 10, age 27.2 ± 3.36 years, height 176.2 ± 7.94 cm, weight 76.39 ± 11.47 kg). 1RM hip thrust, 40m sprint time, and individual 10m split timings: 0-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40m, wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review, however, indicates that there might be poor agreement about the physiological mechanisms underpinning maximal strength training. Adaptations to the neural system, such as the recruitment of additional or higher threshold motor units [34,35], the recruitment of more fast twitch muscle fibres (type IIx), greater synchronisation of discharge of motor units [38,44], greater efferent drive [44], increases in corticospinal excitability coinciding with reductions in short-interval intracortical inhibition [47] or enhanced neural coordination [52,53], have all been suggested to underpin improvements in maximal strength. In contrast, increases in muscle cross-sectional area, the conversion of muscle fibre types from type IIa to type IIx, changes in pennation angle, and the secretion of growthpromoting hormones [37,43,45,48,51] have also been suggested to explain maximal strength improvements following training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This review, however, indicates that there might be poor agreement about the physiological mechanisms underpinning maximal strength training. Adaptations to the neural system, such as the recruitment of additional or higher threshold motor units [34,35], the recruitment of more fast twitch muscle fibres (type IIx), greater synchronisation of discharge of motor units [38,44], greater efferent drive [44], increases in corticospinal excitability coinciding with reductions in short-interval intracortical inhibition [47] or enhanced neural coordination [52,53], have all been suggested to underpin improvements in maximal strength. In contrast, increases in muscle cross-sectional area, the conversion of muscle fibre types from type IIa to type IIx, changes in pennation angle, and the secretion of growthpromoting hormones [37,43,45,48,51] have also been suggested to explain maximal strength improvements following training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean ± SD methodological quality rating score was 17.7 ± 2.3 out of a possible 29, with a range of 14-23 ( Table 5). Only four studies achieved a methodological quality rating of good, which was categorised as a score of 20 or above [39,48,53,54]. Other studies scored a 'moderate' rating.…”
Section: Methodsological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations