2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.04.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer enhancement in suspensions of agitated solids. Part III: Thermophoretic transport of nanoparticles in the diffusion limit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(144 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, notice in Figure 5, a-d, that Blackwell's solution would not be considered appropriate for the measurement of the thermal conductivity for τ < 1.2 × 10 −4 (ln τ = -9) for test cases a and c, and for τ < 2.5 × 10 −3 (ln τ = -6) for test cases b and d. In other words, the increase generally detected with the line heat source probe for the thermal conductivity of nanofluids cannot be attributed to the non-Fourier heat transfer mechanisms examined earlier. In fact, recent theoretical predictions corroborate our findings and demonstrate that nanoparticles and the base fluid are in thermal equilibrium in nanofluids [23,34].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, notice in Figure 5, a-d, that Blackwell's solution would not be considered appropriate for the measurement of the thermal conductivity for τ < 1.2 × 10 −4 (ln τ = -9) for test cases a and c, and for τ < 2.5 × 10 −3 (ln τ = -6) for test cases b and d. In other words, the increase generally detected with the line heat source probe for the thermal conductivity of nanofluids cannot be attributed to the non-Fourier heat transfer mechanisms examined earlier. In fact, recent theoretical predictions corroborate our findings and demonstrate that nanoparticles and the base fluid are in thermal equilibrium in nanofluids [23,34].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Experiments with nanofluids have indicated significant increases in thermal conductivity, as compared to base liquids without nanoparticles or with larger suspended particles [14,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Generally, the observed increase in thermal conductivity of nanofluids was substantially larger than that predicted with the available theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many questions still remain, one of which is the dependence of thermophoresis on particle size. Practically, the characteristic of size dependent thermophoresis has a potential application for the separation of particles of different sizes [9][10][11], the manipulation of DNAs [12][13][14], and the enhancement of heat transfer of nanofluids [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In the literature, although numerous theoretical and experimental studies have been reported on the size dependence of thermophoresis for dilute polystyrene (PS) beads dispersed in aqueous solutions, the results of these investigations are inconsistent and inconclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible explanations for the divergence between theory and experiments were suggested and explored very basically by Brownian motion of the particles [17,18], micro-convection due to Brownian motion [19], molecular-level layering of the liquid at the liquid/particle interface [17,18,20], the nature of heat transport within the nanoparticles and effects of nanoparticle clustering [17,18], thermo-phoresis [21,22], electro-phoresis [21], hyperbolic heat conduction [23], Dual-phase-lagging effect of heat conduction in the nanofluid suspension [21]. To this end, most of these proposed mechanisms have been eliminated due to the theoretical outcomes of more detailed investigations except the dual-phase lagging, and that of nanoparticle clustering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%