1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.39.6231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat capacity of magnetite in the range 0.3 to 10 K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the simple assumption that the hopping conductivity indefinitely decreases with decreasing size and saturates to the bulk value with increasing size, we adopt a phenomenological formula of , where E P,bulk and T 2,bulk are the polaron-binding energy and T 2 in bulk, respectively. A linear fit of our data with the reported values (θ D ≈ 500 K, 38 E P ≈ 200 meV, 39 and T 2,bulk ≈ 30 ms 18 ) gives α ≈ 0.54 and d c ≈ 8.3 nm. The exponent α decreases and the critical size d c increases as T 2,bulk increases.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the simple assumption that the hopping conductivity indefinitely decreases with decreasing size and saturates to the bulk value with increasing size, we adopt a phenomenological formula of , where E P,bulk and T 2,bulk are the polaron-binding energy and T 2 in bulk, respectively. A linear fit of our data with the reported values (θ D ≈ 500 K, 38 E P ≈ 200 meV, 39 and T 2,bulk ≈ 30 ms 18 ) gives α ≈ 0.54 and d c ≈ 8.3 nm. The exponent α decreases and the critical size d c increases as T 2,bulk increases.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Then, for d > d c , the nanocrystals should satisfy the following equation: , where E P,bulk and T 2,bulk are the polaron-binding energy and T 2 in bulk, respectively. A linear fit of our data with the reported values (θ D ≈ 500 K, E P ≈ 200 meV, and T 2,bulk ≈ 30 ms) gives α ≈ 0.54 and d c ≈ 8.3 nm. The exponent α decreases and the critical size d c increases as T 2,bulk increases.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…The heat capacities of type I and II materials differ significantly below their respective Τv values down to the lowest measured temperatures, as shown in Fig. 10 [20,22]. This trend is also mirrored in the Debye θ values extracted from such measurements.…”
Section: Transitions Of Variable Order In Magnetitesupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Lattice vacancies are generally determined using redox titrations or thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) [53][54][55][56][57][58][59], but for nanomaterials and materials with very few vacancies, less conventional methods are required such as EXAFS [60,61], XANES [61], other X-ray techniques [53,61], Raman spectroscopy [60,61], high resolution TEM [61], EELS [62], XEDS [63], STEM [64], neutron diffraction [53,59], and a plethora of esoteric techniques [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73].…”
Section: B Lattice Vacanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%