1947
DOI: 10.1021/ja01194a008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat Capacities at Low Temperatures of Titanium Dioxide (Rutile and Anatase)1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heat capacity data for quartz between 50 and 520 K were provided by Richet et al (1982). For kaolinite, data were taken from Robie and Hemingway (1991) between 5 and 298 K and from Robie and Hemingway (1995) above 298 K. Heat capacity data for anatase were given by Shomate (1947), from 50 to 298 K and Robie and Hemingway (1995) above 298 K. The heat capacity data for the dehydrated beidellite are listed at selected temperatures in Table 7.…”
Section: Heat Capacities Of the Dehydrated Beidellite Sbid-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heat capacity data for quartz between 50 and 520 K were provided by Richet et al (1982). For kaolinite, data were taken from Robie and Hemingway (1991) between 5 and 298 K and from Robie and Hemingway (1995) above 298 K. Heat capacity data for anatase were given by Shomate (1947), from 50 to 298 K and Robie and Hemingway (1995) above 298 K. The heat capacity data for the dehydrated beidellite are listed at selected temperatures in Table 7.…”
Section: Heat Capacities Of the Dehydrated Beidellite Sbid-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat capacities of the clay mineral can then be calculated at any temperature. For rutile, data were provided by Shomate (1947) between 52 and 298 K, and by Robie and Hemingway (1995) between 298.15 and 520 K. These data were extracted from two different referenced works, which cover, respectively, temperature ranges lower and higher than 298.15 K. A slight difference of 0.45% of C p value was observed between heat capacities at 298.15 K. Nevertheless, the resulting error on the heat capacity of the mineral at 298.15 K, which is ±0.003%, can be neglected compared to the uncertainties on measurements of the heat capacities of the mineral. Molar heat capacity values of the chlorite C o p;m are given at selected temperatures in Table 5.…”
Section: Heat Capacities Of the Clay Mineralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silica impurity contributions to the measured heat capacities vary between 20% and 27% for MX-80 and 7% and 8% for IMt-2 and are about 0.8% for ISCz-1. For microcline, heat capacity data were taken from Openshaw et al (1976) between 5 and 298 K and from Robie and Hemingway (1995) between 298.15 and 520 K. For kaolinite, data were taken from Robie and Hemingway (1991) between 7 and 298 K and from Robie and Hemingway (1995) between 298.15 and 520 K. For rutile, data were provided by Shomate (1947) between 52 and 298 K and by Robie and Hemingway (1995) between 298.15 and 520 K. For these latter impurities, data were extracted from two different referenced works, which cover, respectively, temperature ranges lower and higher than 298.15 K. For a given impurity (except silica), some differences were observed between heat capacities at 298.15 K. Nevertheless, the resulting errors in the heat capacity of the minerals at 298.15 K are lower than 0.03% for mixed-layer and 0.003% for illite. They are small compared to the expected maximum absolute errors on measurements of the heat capacities of the minerals, which are: 1% between 5 and 30 K; 0.05-0.1% between 30 and 100 K; 0.03% from 100 to 380 K for MX-80 and ISCz-1 and from 100 to 400 K for IMt-2 (adiabatic calorimetry measurements); and 0.1% in the range 380-520 K for MX-80 and ISCz-1 and in the 400-510 K range for IMt-2 (DSC measurements).…”
Section: Heat Capacities Of the Clay Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 99%