1991
DOI: 10.1097/00006842-199101000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart rate reactivity to laboratory tasks and ambulatory heart rate in daily life.

Abstract: This study investigated relationships between laboratory task-related heart rate reactivity and ambulatory heart rate responses and variability during daily life. Sixty-two healthy, young men completed one laboratory session consisting of pretask rest, reaction time, video game, and mental arithmetic, and one 24-hour ambulatory heart rate monitoring day. After controlling for ambulatory physical activity, laboratory reactivity measured as basal-to-task increase correlated significantly with ambulatory minimum,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The self-reported events included concerns relating to marital disagreements, nance and domestic issues, with a minimum number of ve, self-initiated recordings from a participant over the session. Despite evidence concerning the predictive relationship between laboratory measures and psychophysiological responses to 'real life' events (Cornish, Blanchard & Jaccard, 1994;Johnston et al, 1994;Pollock, 1991), these data indicate that laboratory stressors provide probable underestimates of the cardiovascular reactivity to daily events, as previously suggested (Al'Absi, Bongard, Buchanan, Pincomb, Licinio & Lovallo, 1997). The data as a whole con rm the expected decreases in negative mood states for post-AMI patients over the 18-month rehabilitation period.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The self-reported events included concerns relating to marital disagreements, nance and domestic issues, with a minimum number of ve, self-initiated recordings from a participant over the session. Despite evidence concerning the predictive relationship between laboratory measures and psychophysiological responses to 'real life' events (Cornish, Blanchard & Jaccard, 1994;Johnston et al, 1994;Pollock, 1991), these data indicate that laboratory stressors provide probable underestimates of the cardiovascular reactivity to daily events, as previously suggested (Al'Absi, Bongard, Buchanan, Pincomb, Licinio & Lovallo, 1997). The data as a whole con rm the expected decreases in negative mood states for post-AMI patients over the 18-month rehabilitation period.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Several reports have shown significant associations between reactivity and ABP means (Ewart & Kolodner, 1993; Ironson et al, 1989; Light, Turnere, Hinderliter, & Sherwood, 1993), but several others have failed to demonstrate significant associations (Fredrikson, Blumenthal, Evans, Sherwood, & Light, 1989; Langewitz, Ruddel, Schachinger, & Schmieder, 1989). The same is true for the literature linking laboratory reactivity with variability of ambulatory cardiovascular activity, where both positive findings (Floras, Hassan, Jones, & Sleight, 1987; Johnston, Anastasiades, & Wood, 1990; Langewitz et al, 1989; Manuck, Corse, & Winkleman, 1979; Parati et al, 1988; Pollak, 1991; Watson, Stallard, Flinn, & Littler, 1980) and negative results have been observed (Cornish, Blanchard, & Jaccard, 1994; Harshfield et al, 1988; Melville & Raftery, 1980; Southard et al, 1986; Van Egeren & Sparrow, 1989).…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Bei allen im Labor durchgeführten Untersuchungen muss die Frage gestellt werden, ob die Ergebnisse Gültigkeit für die Umstände im täglichen Leben haben. Durchgeführte physiologische Studien fanden eher keine signifikanten Zusammenhänge zwischen zum Beispiel Herzfrequenzen im Labor und im Feld [17], andere fanden unterschied liche [18] oder nur geringe Zusammenhänge [19]. In einem multimodal angelegten Labor-Feld-Vergleich konnte keine signifikante Vorhersagbarkeit der Reaktionen gefunden werden, was den weitreichenden Schluss fand: "Die Untersuchungsergebnisse sprechen für die relative Eigenständigkeit dieser Felddaten..." [20], sodass man annehmen darf, dass im Labor erhobene Daten wahrscheinlich für einige, nicht aber für alle Situationen im täglichen Leben Gültigkeit haben, also kaum generalisierbar sind.…”
Section: Einführung In Die Feldphysiologieunclassified