2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart failure is associated with reduced patency after endovascular intervention for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease

Abstract: CHF is associated with reduced patency after peripheral endovascular intervention and is an independent risk factor for patency loss. Specifically, CHF and reduced EF (<40%) is a strong independent risk factor for patency loss.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 Numerous recent reports, however, have identified a role for endovascular therapy in selected patients with limb-threatening ischemia. [4][5][6] Although the availability of these complimentary approaches may benefit patients and providers alike, identification of the optimal revascularization strategy for any given patient can be challenging. The heralded BASIL trial remains the only randomized, controlled study addressing this issue, 19 but debate surrounding the applicability of BASIL with respect to disease severity and treatment modalities highlights an inherent limitation of randomized controlled trials: however well-designed, the trial results may not be readily applicable to the individual patients encountered in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3 Numerous recent reports, however, have identified a role for endovascular therapy in selected patients with limb-threatening ischemia. [4][5][6] Although the availability of these complimentary approaches may benefit patients and providers alike, identification of the optimal revascularization strategy for any given patient can be challenging. The heralded BASIL trial remains the only randomized, controlled study addressing this issue, 19 but debate surrounding the applicability of BASIL with respect to disease severity and treatment modalities highlights an inherent limitation of randomized controlled trials: however well-designed, the trial results may not be readily applicable to the individual patients encountered in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 However, numerous recent reports describe acceptable limb salvage rates with endovascular therapy in select patients. [4][5][6] Although the durability of endovascular interventions in patients with CLI is inferior to bypass surgery, a minimally invasive, endovascular approach may be preferable in patients at the highest risk for perioperative adverse events. Perioperative risk assessment is a fundamental consideration for clinical decision making in CLI, but patient suitability for surgery may be difficult to determine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HF and LV dysfunction result in decreased patency in the chronic phase 17) , and the incidence of with PAD undergoing vascular surgery in order to decrease cardiac morbidity and mortality 4) . In the present study, the 30-day mortality rate was significantly decreased among those treated with beta-blockers, without a corresponding increase in major amputation or bypass conversion within 30 days after surgery.…”
Section: Baseline Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Cardiac co-morbidities are common in CLI patients, and the prevalence of HF has been reported to be 10-40% in this population. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Although HF has been identified as an important risk factor for increased mortality and/or amputation, most studies failed to stratify HF patients by left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) 10,12,13,17 or limited their evaluation to those with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. 11,14,15 Inadequate systemic perfusion as a consequence of HF may pose a threat to CLI patients by putting them at a higher risk for embolism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%