The endovascular management of CTO results in reasonable primary patency; moreover, secondary patency at 2 years is excellent. Endovascular therapy should be the first-line option for many patients with peripheral artery disease, including those with CLI, claudicants with poor bypass conduit, or patients at high medical risk for surgery. The presence of CTOs does not appear to change these recommendations. Although multiple reinterventions may be required, endovascular therapies can be considered a primary therapy for many patients with CTO.

Patients who were receiving statin therapy when they underwent interventions to treat CLI had significantly improved overall survival, primary and secondary patency, and limb salvage rates. Our findings suggest that statins should be part of the periprocedural treatment regimen and support further investigation into the beneficial effects of statins in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of CLI.

Overall, CFE is tolerated well by the majority of patients with peripheral arterial disease. These results affirm the safety of CFE and can still be used as standard first-line therapy in most patients. Long-term results for endovascular interventions need to be studied to see whether high-risk patients that we identified for CFE would benefit more from an endovascular approach.

The CRAB is a CLI-specific, risk assessment instrument derived from multi-institutional American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical outcomes data that out-performs existing prognostic risk indices in the prediction of clinically significant adverse events after bypass surgery. Use of the CRAB as a risk assessment tool provides an evidence basis for patient-centered clinical decision making and may have a role in identifying patients at higher risk for surgical revascularization in whom an endovascular approach is preferable.

No abstract

This study demonstrates that most patients require multiple reinterventions to treat type II endoleaks; specifically, lumbar artery embolization carries a low midterm success rate.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is widely employed to detect axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with clinically negative (N0) axillae. One of the few reported contraindications to SLNB is prior treatment with systemic chemotherapy (neoadjuvant/induction chemotherapy). Previous investigators reported difficulty identifying the sentinel node and an unacceptable false-negative rate in this patient cohort. We present one experienced surgeon's experience with SLNB following induction chemotherapy (n = 21). Following treatment with Adriamycin and Cytoxan (AC)-based cyclic chemotherapy, patients underwent SLNB, followed by levels I and II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). At least one sentinel node was identified in all patients (100%). With respect to metastatic disease, the status of the sentinel node(s) accurately reflected the status of the axilla in 20 of 21 patients (95%). Eleven patients (52%) had axillary metastases identified by ALND. Of this group, SLNB failed to identify metastatic disease in one patient (9%). Previous treatment with induction chemotherapy should not be considered an absolute contraindication to SLNB. An experienced surgeon may utilize the technique in these patients, sparing them the added morbidity of axillary dissection.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organization had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.