Health Utility Weighting of the Modified Rankin Scale

Abstract

IMPORTANCE The utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (UW-mRS) has been proposed as a patient-centered alternative primary outcome for stroke clinical trials. However, to date, there is no clear consensus on an approach to weighting the mRS. OBJECTIVE To characterize the between-study variability in utility weighting of the mRS in a population of patients who experienced stroke and its implications when applied to the results of a clinical trial. DATA SOURCES In this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from January 1987 through May 2019 using major search terms for stroke, health utility, and mRS. STUDY SELECTION Original research articles published in English were reviewed. Included were studies with participants 18 years or older with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or subarachnoid hemorrhage, with mRS scores and utility weights evaluated concurrently. A total of 5725 unique articles were identified. Of these, 283 met criteria for full-text review, and 24 were included in the meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS PRISMA guidelines for systematic review were followed. Data extraction was performed independently by multiple researchers. Data were pooled using mixed models. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The mean utility weights and 95% CIs were calculated for each mRS score and health utility scale. Geographic differences in weighting for the EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) and Stroke Impact Scale-based UW-mRS were explored using inverse variance-weighted linear models. The results of 18 major acute stroke trials cited in current guidelines were then reanalyzed using the UW-mRS weighting scales identified in the systematic review. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 22 389 individuals; the mean (SD) age of participants was 65.9 (4.0) years, and the mean (SD) proportion of male participants was 58.2% (7.5%). For all health utility scales evaluated, statistically significant differences were observed between the mean utility weights by mRS score. For studies using an EQ-5D-weighted mRS, between-study variance was higher for worse (mRS 2-5) compared with better (mRS 0-1) scores. Of the 18 major acute stroke trials with reanalyzed results, 3 had an unstable outcome when using different UW-mRSs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Multiple factors, including cohort-specific characteristics and health utility scale selection, can influence mRS utility weighting. If the UW-mRS is selected as a primary outcome, the approach to weighting may alter the results of a clinical trial. Researchers using (continued) Key Points Question Is a preexisting health utilityweighted outcome scale suitable for use in a clinical trial, or is a study-specific approach more appropriate? Findings Among 24 studies including 22 389 individuals, this systematic review and meta-analysis found statistically significant between-study differences for studies reporting utility weighting of the modified Rankin Scale. When applied to the results of major acute stroke trials, different studysp...

Comparing health-related quality of life in modified Rankin Scale grades: 15D results from 323 patients with brain arteriovenous malformation and population controls

“…According to our results, patients in mRS 0 formed a distinctive group with superior HRQoL compared to the rest. This finding is against the recent findings of two meta-analyses using the EQ-5D instrument on stroke patients [ 32 , 41 ]. In these studies, patients in mRS 0 and 1 formed the most closely associated grades according to utility weights.…”

Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Patients With Stroke Presenting With Low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score in the Early and Extended Window

“…The 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was used as the primary outcome measure and was recorded during a follow-up visit or telephone encounter at a mean (SD) of 90 (14) days after stroke by a stroke neurologist or registered nurse. 16 Favorable outcome was defined as an mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined as postprocedural hemorrhage with an associated decrease of 4 points or more in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score.…”

“…Patients with an ASPECTS of 2 to 5 were younger (median age, 70 years [IQR, 59-77 years] vs 72 years [IQR, 60-81 years]; P = .003), had a higher median NIHSS score on presentation (18 [IQR, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] vs 16 [IQR, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; P < .001), and were more likely to present with an ICA occlusion (102 of 213 [47.9%] vs 614 of 2132 [28.8%]) compared with patients presenting with an ASPECTS of 6 to 10 (Table 1).…”

Drip-and-ship versus mothership for endovascular treatment of acute stroke: A comparative effectiveness analysis

“…Multiple factors can influence mRS utility weighting including cohortspecific characteristics. 24 Some of these studies were research trials with potential selection bias, and further validation might be needed as more data become available. 25 A summary of the recent modeling studies on this topic is presented in the Online Supplement.…”