2019
DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health state utility values in schizophrenia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: IntroductionCost-effectiveness analyses that use quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) allow comparing the value for money of interventions across different health problems. Health state utility values (HSUVs) are crucial to calculate QALYs. These are weights attached to a given health state reflecting preferences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In schizophrenia, there is extensive evidence about the consequences of this condition on HRQoL. Besides, several interventions have claimed to be cost-effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These measures will significantly contribute to the transparency of the subsequent systematic review process, thereby promoting the quality and validity of the complete systematic review and meta-analysis in the future. Similar studies have been published in the acupuncture field 47 , 48 and other research fields, 49 , 50 so we think this is a favorable approach to follow.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These measures will significantly contribute to the transparency of the subsequent systematic review process, thereby promoting the quality and validity of the complete systematic review and meta-analysis in the future. Similar studies have been published in the acupuncture field 47 , 48 and other research fields, 49 , 50 so we think this is a favorable approach to follow.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 19 as well as published recommendations. 12,17,20 A protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42019123582) and published 21 in a peer-reviewed journal.…”
Section: Protocol and Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, we applied prespecified criteria after consulting experts in the field and published recommendations. 21 In general, there are strengths in the included studies, such as the use of appropriate protocols in the valuation of health states. Studies applying direct valuation used validated protocols, such as those described by Torrance 47 and Williams.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias Within Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%