2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12955-017-0704-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health-related quality of life effects of enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an in-depth post hoc analysis of EQ-5D data from the PREVAIL trial

Abstract: BackgroundThe effect of enzalutamide on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the PREVAIL trial in chemotherapy-naïve men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was analyzed using the generic EQ-5D instrument.MethodsPatients received oral enzalutamide 160 mg/day (n = 872) or placebo (n = 845). EQ-5D index and EQ-5D visual analogue scale (EQ-5D VAS) scores were evaluated at baseline, week 13, and every 12 weeks until week 61 due to sample size reduction thereafter. Changes on individual dimens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose Set 1 because the authors used the EQ-5D-5 L version to evaluate the health-related quality of life of individuals with diabetes, a chronic disease that we incorporated in our data set (Set 3). We chose Set 2 for two reasons: (i) in their study, Devlin et al [14] used the EQ-5D-3 L version, which is the case also in our study (Set 3); (ii) Devlin et al evaluated in their clinical trial the positive impact of medical treatment on the quality of life of patients. Devlin et al data set (Set 2) enabled us to test the effectiveness of the Improved RIDIT method to evaluate the health quality of life in clinical trials.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We chose Set 1 because the authors used the EQ-5D-5 L version to evaluate the health-related quality of life of individuals with diabetes, a chronic disease that we incorporated in our data set (Set 3). We chose Set 2 for two reasons: (i) in their study, Devlin et al [14] used the EQ-5D-3 L version, which is the case also in our study (Set 3); (ii) Devlin et al evaluated in their clinical trial the positive impact of medical treatment on the quality of life of patients. Devlin et al data set (Set 2) enabled us to test the effectiveness of the Improved RIDIT method to evaluate the health quality of life in clinical trials.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also tested the Improved RIDIT method on the health-related quality of life data obtained through the EQ-5D-3 L version administered by Devlin et al [14]. In contrast to Mateo et al [23] analyzing the effect of Table 2 False positive rate detected by the Improved RIDIT and MWW relative to nominal α = 0.05 using simulation under the null hypothesis.…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations