2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health professionals’ perceptions of intimate partner violence against women in Serbia: Opportunities and barriers for response improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
45
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the nursing staff was usually found lack of education concerning to domestic violence issues (Davis & Harsh, 2001). In a study of health professionals' perception of IPV in Serbia, though all participants deemed IPV as totally unacceptable action, the surveyed blamed both the abuser and the victim for the incident (Djikanovic, Celik, Simic, Matejic, & Cucic, 2010).…”
Section: Surveys Of Attitude Toward Ipvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the nursing staff was usually found lack of education concerning to domestic violence issues (Davis & Harsh, 2001). In a study of health professionals' perception of IPV in Serbia, though all participants deemed IPV as totally unacceptable action, the surveyed blamed both the abuser and the victim for the incident (Djikanovic, Celik, Simic, Matejic, & Cucic, 2010).…”
Section: Surveys Of Attitude Toward Ipvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8] Concern about personal safety has also been mentioned, 7,24 but may loom larger in countries like Lebanon, where DV is not criminalised and the authorities are not perceived to be protective. There were barriers identified by participating physicians that are more specific to this region, and could be applicable to other areas, namely the religiously-based beliefs of the physicians and a medical education and healthcare system that do not include DV in its scope.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In simple terms, it is purported that job strain may result from high work demands coupled by low levels of work control and support, though this finding is not always consistent [17]. In the context of IPV screening, qualitative interviews with healthcare workers [14] [18] [19] have consistently implicated work-environmental characteristics such as high work demands, weak support networks and low levels of decision autonomy as possible hinders to the practice of IPV screening, but the quantification of these factors as determinants of IPV screening remains an important gap in the research. Indeed, systematic reviews of the quantitative research in the field [20] have found majority of studies on barriers to IPV screening in healthcare to focus on individual related barriers (e.g.…”
Section: Screening For Ipv: Global Overview Knowledge Gap and Contrimentioning
confidence: 99%