2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health monitoring of steel box girder bridges using non-contact sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vehicle load excitation produced a higher signal-to-noise ratio than ambient excitation, providing a more explicit response to local damage [22]. Some studies showed that simple span bridges face more significant challenges and have more critical behavior than continuous span bridges due to their lack of girder continuity when damaged [29,38].…”
Section: Dynamic Characteristics In Response To Damage Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vehicle load excitation produced a higher signal-to-noise ratio than ambient excitation, providing a more explicit response to local damage [22]. Some studies showed that simple span bridges face more significant challenges and have more critical behavior than continuous span bridges due to their lack of girder continuity when damaged [29,38].…”
Section: Dynamic Characteristics In Response To Damage Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in 2021, Abedin and Mehrabi [29] conducted a study on modal analysis, demonstrating its suitability for evaluating the capacity of such bridges to withstand substantial damage while still supporting significant live loads. They analyzed a three-span steel bridge with twin box girders and compared their results to full-scale load test results from a simple span bridge [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the contact conditions, the contactor elements cannot penetrate the target surface, but the target elements can penetrate the contactor surface during convergence solution. In the non-friction contact problem, there are three states between the contact node and the target element: (1) there is no contact between them, and the crack is in the open state; (2) there is complete contact between them, and the crack is in the closed state; (3) in the transitional stage between the first two states, the crack is neither fully opened nor fully contacted. Therefore, the non-linear effect of contact element can be simulated through establishing contact pairs at the crack location, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Contact Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural health monitoring (SHM) system plays an important role in ensuring bridge structural safety. Damage identification as an important part of SHM is sensitive to structural stiffness reduction [1]. The development of damage diagnosis and data mining theory further promotes the accuracy of structural damage identification [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasibility of using self-powered wireless sensors for monitoring steel bridges has also been investigated [140]. Abedin and Mehrabi (2021) studied the modal analysis method and demonstrated its applicability for damage detection in steel girder bridges. Their results showed that modal sensitivities are indicative enough for detecting certain expected damages in simple and continuous span bridges, where the frequency change method may not be adequately sensitive [141].…”
Section: Global Structural Response Testing (Gsr)mentioning
confidence: 99%