Health IT Usability Focus Section: Data Use and Navigation Patterns among Medical ICU Clinicians during Electronic Chart Review

Abstract

Background A detailed understanding of electronic health record (EHR) workflow patterns and information use is necessary to inform user-centered design of critical care information systems. While developing a longitudinal medical record visualization tool to facilitate electronic chart review (ECR) for medical intensive care unit (MICU) clinicians, we found inadequate research on clinician–EHR interactions. Objective We systematically studied EHR information use and workflow among MICU clinicians to determine the optimal selection and display of core data for a revised EHR interface. Methods We conducted a direct observational study of MICU clinicians performing ECR for unfamiliar patients during their routine daily practice at an academic medical center. Using a customized manual data collection instrument, we unobtrusively recorded the content and sequence of EHR data reviewed by clinicians. Results We performed 32 ECR observations among 24 clinicians. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) chart review duration was 9.2 (7.3–14.7) minutes, with the largest time spent reviewing clinical notes (44.4%), laboratories (13.3%), imaging studies (11.7%), and searching/scrolling (9.4%). Historical vital sign and intake/output data were never viewed in 31% and 59% of observations, respectively. Clinical notes and diagnostic reports were browsed ≥10 years in time for 60% of ECR sessions. Clinicians viewed a median of 7 clinical notes, 2.5 imaging studies, and 1.5 diagnostic studies, typically referencing a select few subtypes. Clinicians browsed a median (IQR) of 26.5 (22.5–37.25) data screens to complete their ECR, demonstrating high variability in navigation patterns and frequent back-and-forth switching between screens. Nonetheless, 47% of ECRs begin with review of clinical notes, which were also the most common navigation destination. Conclusion Electronic chart review centers around the viewing of clinical notes among MICU clinicians. Convoluted workflows and prolonged searching activities indicate room for system improvement. Using study findings, specific design recommendations to enhance usability for critical care information systems are provided.

Nurses’ Perceptions of a Care Plan Information Technology Solution With Hundreds of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Adult Intensive Care Units: Survey Study

“…Our findings were consistent with common areas identified by usability studies of nursing documentation systems related to the long time for documentation and task completion, lack of data relevancy, and nurse perception of lack of system effect on quality of care [24,31,32,37,38]. Yet, our study was specific to the usability of a CPG-based care planning solution within the nursing documentation system and found a lack of system safety features as a major concern for nurses.…”

Impact of Patient Census and Admission Mortality on Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Attending Electronic Health Record Activity: A Preliminary Study

“…20,[22][23][24][25] Thus, workflow studies that include an analysis of EHR usage are necessary to identify issues and make critical changes to ensure the well-being of patients and clinicians. 26 Our examination of 24/7 EHR usage gave rise to results different from previous time motion studies. There was no strong association between EHR usage and patient census or admission mortality scores, even when strictly focusing on PICU attending shifts.…”

Assessment of Electronic Health Record Search Patterns and Practices by Practitioners in a Large Integrated Health Care System

“…This difference may be related to the size and scope of our study and the near-decade of EHR advancements since the publication of the prior study. 16 A number of studies 18,19,30,41 have explored practitioners' information-seeking practices in general and EHR navigation, typically in small samples of practitioners and often using methods such as direct observation.…”