Health hackathons: theatre or substance? A survey assessment of outcomes from healthcare-focused hackathons in three countries

Abstract

BackgroundHealthcare-focused hackathons are 48-hour platforms intended to accelerate novel medical technology. However, debate exists about how much they contribute to medical technology innovation. The Consortium for Affordable Medical Technologies (CAMTech) has developed a three-pronged model to maximise their effectiveness. To gauge the success of this model, we examined follow-up outcomes.MethodsOutcomes of 12 hackathons from 2012 to 2015 in India, Uganda and the USA were measured using emailed surveys. To minimise response bias, non-responding teams were coded as having made no progress.Results331 individuals provided information on 196 of 356 projects (55.1% response rate), with no difference in responses from teams participating in different countries (Cramer's V=0.09, p=0.17). 30.3% of projects had made progress after a mean of 12.2 months. 88 (24.7%) teams had initiated pilot testing, with 42 (11.8%) piloting with care providers and 24 (6.7%) with patients. Overall, 97 teams (8.1 per hackathon) drafted business plans, 22 (1.8 per hackathon) had filed patents on their innovations and 15 (1.3 per hackathon) had formed new companies. Teams raised US$64.08 million in funding (average US$5.34 million per hackathon; median award size of $1800). In addition, 108 teams (30.3%) reported at least one member working on additional technologies with people they met at a hackathon. Individual confidence to address medical technology challenges was significantly increased after attending (t(1282)=192.77, p 0.001).ConclusionCAMTech healthcare hackathons lead to consistent output with respect to medical technology innovation, including clinical trials, business plan development, securing investment capital/funding and new company formation.

Health diplomacy through health entrepreneurship: using hackathons to address Palestinian-Israeli health concerns

“…As the experience in Nazareth suggests, they are also reliable methods to source pain points in health from the population and demonstrate to people of all socioeconomic and professional backgrounds that they are able to contribute together to addressing these problems. Coupled with institutional partners and investors, they serve as runways for new ventures creating value for the community 42…”

Wisdom of the Crowds: Crowd-Based Development of a Logo for a Conference Using a Crowdsourcing Contest

“…Third, sexual health campaigns that originated from community based organizations have reported objective impact to increase health-seeking behaviors, STD testing and HIV/STD knowledge in men who have sex with men in Australia(3). In recent years, there is increasing evidence demonstrating how crowdsourcing methods such as hackathons and innovation contests may also be used for more substantial outcome deliverables (promotional videos or educational images, full campaigns, spurring medical innovation)(6, 7, 23). In circumstances where community engagement is crucial for reducing stigma and discrimination, which is often the case for sexual health promotion, the adaptation of an innovation contest to promote key messages can be effective because people are familiar with contests in other settings.…”

Surgathon: a new model for creating a surgical innovation ecosystem in low-resource settings

“…We propose a new conceptual model for global surgical innovation that aims to be comprehensive in its approach to community engagement, resource allocation and human investment. We have applied this conceptual model to health hackathons in low-resource settings that, over the past decade, have become a common tool for sparking excitement and inspiring solutions for challenges in healthcare 9–13. A ‘surgathon’ shares problem statements that are focused on local challenges in the delivery of surgery and anaesthesia to multidisciplinary participants.…”