2017
DOI: 10.1097/olq.0000000000000658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wisdom of the Crowds: Crowd-Based Development of a Logo for a Conference Using a Crowdsourcing Contest

Abstract: Background Crowdsourcing methods have been widely used in business, but rarely in sexual health research. We evaluated a crowdsourced logo contest as part of an international HIV conference. Methods A logo crowdsourcing contest was conducted for the 20th International AIDS Conference. Crowdsourcing has a group of individuals solve a task, often as part of an open contest. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key informants including contest organizers, contest contributors, and conference attendees… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative studies can examine the crowdsourcing activity itself and may include the number and quality of contributions, the number of website views and related social media metrics. [37][38][39] Such evaluations can be used to determine the overall reach and level of participation in a challenge contest, which can further indicate the interest of stakeholders in addressing the health problem targeted by the contest. Observational studies can provide useful information about challenge contests such as the acceptability of the challenge contest for relevant stakeholders, the impact on related participant behaviours and motivations for participation.…”
Section: Evaluating Challenge Contestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative studies can examine the crowdsourcing activity itself and may include the number and quality of contributions, the number of website views and related social media metrics. [37][38][39] Such evaluations can be used to determine the overall reach and level of participation in a challenge contest, which can further indicate the interest of stakeholders in addressing the health problem targeted by the contest. Observational studies can provide useful information about challenge contests such as the acceptability of the challenge contest for relevant stakeholders, the impact on related participant behaviours and motivations for participation.…”
Section: Evaluating Challenge Contestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can take the form of a contest with a purpose of solving the health problem ( Brabham et al, 2014 ). Although it is a relatively new tool, especially in healthcare areas, it was deemed feasible and successful in several studies ( Tucker et al, 2017 ; Tucker et al, 2019 ; DePasse et al, 2014 ; Burdine et al, 2010 ; Brabham et al, 2014 ; Zhang et al, 2015 ; Ong et al, 2017 ). DePasse and colleagues addressed the three core principles for crowdsourcing event: problem-based approach, participation from diverse disciplines, and challenging existing paradigms ( DePasse et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered as a cost-effective “bottom-up” approach to collect crowd input, comparing with conventional “top-down” approach where only experts and professionals are involved [16]. Crowdsourcing contests also show positive results in community engagement ( Ong et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 21 It has also been used in a broad range of settings and sectors to address multiple health issues including enhancement of hepatitis B and C testing, creation of multilingual public health promotion materials and promotion of HIV testing among at-risk men in China. [22][23][24][25] However, such approaches have not been assessed with respect to HIVST among youths in sub-Saharan Africa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%