2006
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
124
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
124
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are relevant to the copollutant dilemma, i.e., the difficulty of parsing the effects of air pollution among PM and non-PM components (37), which remains at the center of current medical, epidemiological, and regulatory debates on tropospheric particulate matter. Should the observed health effects be exclusively ascribed to particulate matter and, if so, to what component(s) of particulate matter, in terms of either particle size or chemistry, or are they elicited by interactions between particulate matter and gaseous copollutants?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are relevant to the copollutant dilemma, i.e., the difficulty of parsing the effects of air pollution among PM and non-PM components (37), which remains at the center of current medical, epidemiological, and regulatory debates on tropospheric particulate matter. Should the observed health effects be exclusively ascribed to particulate matter and, if so, to what component(s) of particulate matter, in terms of either particle size or chemistry, or are they elicited by interactions between particulate matter and gaseous copollutants?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…AOZ may qualify as the stealthy secondary oxidant that diffuses through the ELF toward the biomembranes and trigger inflammatory responses (9). The implication is that AH 2 , an otherwise efficient O 3 (g) scavenger under normal physiological conditions, should gradually lose its effectivity in ELF that become locally acidified by simultaneous inhalation of acidic airborne particles (35)(36)(37) or by preexistent pathologies such as asthma (38) or defective airway pH homeostasis (39). Secondary fine particulate matter (PM Ͻ2.5 ) should be particularly detrimental (2) because, by growing on sulfate/sulfuric acid nuclei, is essentially acidic and, because of its small size, can reach deeper into the airways to generate local acidic conditions (39)(40)(41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction Pope et al 2006). Biological evidence supporting plausible mechanisms is clear and includes pulmonary oxidative stress, inflammation and altered cardiac autonomic function (Pope et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological evidence supporting plausible mechanisms is clear and includes pulmonary oxidative stress, inflammation and altered cardiac autonomic function (Pope et al 2006). However, evidence in Latin America (LA) is scarce and systematic reviews and meta-analysis (SRMA) on the effects of PM 2.5 on daily health events rarely pool evidence from LA (Adar et al 2014;Shah et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to inhalable particles (PM 10 ), PM 2.5 have more serious effects on human physical health because their small size can carry a variety of other pollutants, which means that the smaller the particle size, the greater the risk it would bring to the human body [14]. Furthermore, recent studies of epidemiology and toxicology showed that long-term exposure to high concentrations of CO or NO x also had a negative effect on human health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%