Health economic assessment of a scenario to promote bicycling as active transport in Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

ObjectivesTo conduct a health economic evaluation of a proposed investment in urban bicycle infrastructure in Stockholm County, Sweden.DesignA cost-effectiveness analysis is undertaken from a healthcare perspective. Investment costs over a 50-year life cycle are offset by averted healthcare costs and compared with estimated long-term impacts on morbidity, quantified in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). The results are re-calculated under different assumptions to model the effects of uncertainty.SettingThe Municipality of Stockholm (population 2.27 million) committed funds for bicycle path infrastructure with the aim of achieving a 15% increase in the number of bicycle commuters by 2030. This work is based on a previously constructed scenario, in which individual registry data on home and work address and a transport model allocation to different modes of transport identified 111 487 individuals with the physical capacity to bicycle to work within 30 min but that currently drive a car to work.ResultsMorbidity impacts and healthcare costs attributed to increased physical activity, change in air pollution exposure and accident risk are quantified under the scenario. The largest reduction in healthcare costs is attributed to increased physical activity and the second largest to reduced air pollution exposure among the population of Greater Stockholm. The expected net benefit from the investment is 8.7% of the 2017 Stockholm County healthcare budget, and 3.7% after discounting. The economic evaluation estimates that the intervention is cost-effective and each DALY averted gives a surplus of €9933. The results remained robust under varied assumptions pertaining to reduced numbers of additional bicycle commuters.ConclusionInvesting in urban infrastructure to increase bicycling as active transport is cost-effective from a healthcare sector perspective.

Using Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Estimate Exposure Lag-Response Associations between Long-Term Air Pollution Exposure and Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease

“…Currently, health economic assessments of air pollution have assumed immediate health effects due to the knowledge gap regarding lag times between exposure and effect. As discussed previously [ 34 , 35 ], it is reasonable to assume that some time after the exposure decrease is needed before expected health effects occur. In previous studies, this has been highlighted as an important limitation, which has hindered the knowledge transfer between interdisciplinary research fields and policymaking.…”

A Literature Review of Emerging Research Needs for Micromobility—Integration through a Life Cycle Thinking Approach

“…Investing in urban infrastructure to increase bicycling is cost-effective from a healthcare perspective. Yet, these studies should, in future, account for societal benefits such as obesity reduction and environmental effects such as air pollution concentration decreases due to multiple factors, since the authors believe the cost savings and health benefits are underestimated [67]. Alternatively, a life cycle cost analysis could consider the recent disruptive innovations and research needs in each of the following five themes, with impact on economic sustainability or with social impacts, such as in the form of safety costs.…”

The Health Cost of Transport in Cities

“…Likewise, a daily exercise of cycling just 3.4 km in urban areas of England and Wales will reduce the cost of healthcare by 0.8% [ 32 ]. In Sweden, the net benefit from a 15% increase in the number of bicycle commuters in Stockholm was estimated at 8.7% of the municipality’s healthcare budget (3.7% after discounting) [ 39 ]. An investment in sidewalks in a Wisconsin community suggests a cost-benefit ratio of 1.81 [ 27 ].…”