2022
DOI: 10.1111/dar.13588
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health and social characteristics of clients reporting amphetamine type substance use at entry to public alcohol and other drug services in New South Wales, Australia, 2016–2019

Abstract: Introduction: Amphetamine type substances (ATS) are commonly used by Australian alcohol and other drug service entrants. We describe demographic characteristics, patterns of ATS and other substance use, health and social conditions among clients entering New South Wales (NSW) public alcohol and other drug services. Methods: Retrospective cohort of 13,864 records across six health districts (2016-2019) for clients seeking substance use treatment. These districts service approximately 44% of the NSW population a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Skew in substance use frequency data in real‐world treatment populations is not uncommon (e.g. [20, 24, 25]). Others who have used the RCI have also noted non‐normally distributed samples [26, 27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Skew in substance use frequency data in real‐world treatment populations is not uncommon (e.g. [20, 24, 25]). Others who have used the RCI have also noted non‐normally distributed samples [26, 27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skew in substance use frequency data in real-world treatment populations is not uncommon (e.g. [20,24,25]).…”
Section: Non-normal Distribution Of Substance Use Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
In Black et al [1] the following errors were published.In Table 2, in column 'High frequency' versus no ATS use, row 'Work/study', data 0.79 and 0.64-0.98 should not be bolded. The correct Table 2 is shown as below.The online article has now been corrected to reflect this as well.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%