2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis of Eupatorium odoratum extract as an oviposition repellent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fiber was also chosen as the best for the collection of volatile mixtures of a similar type as those expected for G. lineatum [7][8][9][10], such as e.g. some plant volatiles [30,31], coleopteran insect secretions [32], and honey [16]. An extraction temperature of 25 • C was used, because this temperature is close to insect defense natural conditions.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fiber was also chosen as the best for the collection of volatile mixtures of a similar type as those expected for G. lineatum [7][8][9][10], such as e.g. some plant volatiles [30,31], coleopteran insect secretions [32], and honey [16]. An extraction temperature of 25 • C was used, because this temperature is close to insect defense natural conditions.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, solidphase microextraction (SPME) and purge-and-trap methods using various adsorbents have been widely used for the rapid extraction of volatile compounds from aromatic and medicinal plants. [16][17][18] SPME has been proven as a useful extraction method, with the advantages of rapidity and simplicity as well as no use of organic solvents. However, several parameters in SPME, such as the times and temperatures of adsorption and desorption process, kind of fibers, and sample amounts, should be optimized prior to sample analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, the designation "volatile organic compounds" does not differentiate between highly or poorly volatile compounds. However, the majority of previous chemical analyses of human scent samples (Cui et al 2009;Curran et al 2010;Curran et al 2005;Kusano et al 2011;Pandey and Kim 2011) implicitly presumed that the highly (and perhaps also moderately) volatile compounds are the most important for human scent signatures. This assumption follows from the analytical chemistry methods that are typically used in these chemical scent analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%