Head motion during cone-beam computed tomography: Analysis of frequency and influence on image quality

Abstract

Purpose: Image artifacts caused by patient motion cause problems in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) because they lead to distortion of the 3-dimensional reconstruction. This prospective study was performed to quantify patient movement during CBCT acquisition and its influence on image quality. Materials and Methods: In total, 412 patients receiving CBCT imaging were equipped with a wireless head sensor system that detected inertial, gyroscopic, and magnetometric movements with 6 dimensions of freedom. The type and amplitude of movements during CBCT acquisition were evaluated and image quality was rated in 7 different anatomical regions of interest. For continuous variables, significance was calculated using the Student t-test. A linear regression model was applied to identify associations of the type and extent of motion with image quality scores. Kappa statistics were used to assess intra-and inter-rater agreement. Chi-square testing was used to analyze the impact of age and sex on head movement. Results: All CBCT images were acquired in a 10-month period. In 24% of the investigations, movement was recorded (acceleration: >0.10 [m/s 2 ]; angular velocity: >0.018 [°/s]). In all examined regions of interest, head motion during CBCT acquisition resulted in significant impairment of image quality (P<0.001). Movement in the horizontal and vertical axes was most relevant for image quality (R 2 >0.7). Conclusion: Relevant head motions during CBCT imaging were frequently detected, leading to image quality loss and potentially impairing diagnosis and therapy planning. The presented data illustrate the need for digital correction algorithms and hardware to minimize motion artefacts in CBCT imaging.

Motion correction for separate mandibular and cranial movements in cone beam CT reconstructions

“…Patient motion during the 10 to 40 s long exposure in maxillofacial CBCT is a frequent finding. Depending on the assessment method, patient motion was detected between 24% 52,53 and up to 78% of the CBCT‐examinations 24 . Typical image degrading effects caused by such motion are motion blur, that is, reduced spatial resolution and typical artifacts like stripe‐ and ring‐patterns 7,8,54 .…”

Feasibility of photon-counting computed tomography as a novel imaging modality for challenging endodontic diagnostic tasks

“…At the same instance, certain inherent limitations also existed, such as absence of motion artefacts. In a clinical scenario, motion artefacts are commonly observed which are responsible for decreasing the image quality 26 , 27 . However, it could be hypothesized that this effect would be more pronounced with CBCT imaging since it is usually performed with the patient standing in an upright position, unlike PCCT imaging which is acquired with the patient in prone position.…”

Dental imaging using an ultra-high resolution photon-counting CT system

“…However, this effect is probably more pronounced in CBCT since patients are usually standing upright whereas in PCCT they are in a prone position. While sophisticated methods exist that account for rigid motion during CBCT acquisitions, such methods are usually not available in commercial systems but are a topic of ongoing research 31 – 33 .…”