2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.07.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head and neck cancer, quality of life, and determinant factors: a novel approach using decision tree analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the first discriminating variable of final decision tree model is considered to have the strongest statistical association with the primary outcome variable. 15,16 In conclusion, among the 3 ESGE's criteria for difficult cannulation, biliary cannulation time and inadvertent PD manipulation would be indicators of PEP development. Furthermore, the biliary cannulation time was the most significant factor for PEP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, the first discriminating variable of final decision tree model is considered to have the strongest statistical association with the primary outcome variable. 15,16 In conclusion, among the 3 ESGE's criteria for difficult cannulation, biliary cannulation time and inadvertent PD manipulation would be indicators of PEP development. Furthermore, the biliary cannulation time was the most significant factor for PEP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, the study by Tseng et al compared decision tree ML technique with a traditional statistical model such as logistic regression in series of 673 oral cancer patients and the decision tree was found to perform better [40]. De Melo et al used decision tree to evaluate the quality of life among patients with head and neck cancer [41]. Similarly, Sumbaly et al used the decision tree in the diagnosis of breast cancer [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence in the literature to support the observation that the use of dental implants in oncologic patients was relatively low, although dental rehabilitation was beneficial for patients [34,37,38]. Particularly advanced tumor stages (T3, T4) often require more extensive surgery and adjuvant therapy approaches, from which it can be deduced that an increasing tumor stage can have a negative effect on QoL [51].…”
Section: Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%