2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haversian remodeling corresponds to load frequency but not strain magnitude in the macaque (Macaca fascicularis) skeleton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, strains below the 100-300 microstrain range activate bone resorption, which reduces unnecessary bone that is metabolically expensive. Low strain magnitudes acting at high frequency are also important in promoting bone formation ( 28 , 29 ). For this to occur, bone cells responsible for bone deposition and resorption must sense such changes in mechanical stimuli.…”
Section: Biomechanical Interaction Between Muscles and Bones In The Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, strains below the 100-300 microstrain range activate bone resorption, which reduces unnecessary bone that is metabolically expensive. Low strain magnitudes acting at high frequency are also important in promoting bone formation ( 28 , 29 ). For this to occur, bone cells responsible for bone deposition and resorption must sense such changes in mechanical stimuli.…”
Section: Biomechanical Interaction Between Muscles and Bones In The Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rabbits that process an overuse diet that includes tough and stiff hay do not have more secondary osteons or more secondary bone than conspecifics raised on a control diet of only pellets. This is surprising given that previous studies (Lad et al, 2016; Lad et al, 2019) suggest that substantial remodeling is generated by repetitive loading in the absence of high strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…First, the answer could simply be that repetitive loading does not generate substantial remodeling activity unless strains are above a certain magnitude and that magnitude was not reached in the present experiment. This explanation seems unlikely given past results from wild samples (Lad et al, 2016; Lad et al, 2019) and given the fact that bone cells are capable of responding to low strain loads in regards to uncoupled bone formation and resorption in this model system (Franks et al, 2017; Menegaz et al, 2009; Scott et al, 2014a) and others (Gilsanz et al, 2006; Judex et al, 2007; Rubin et al, 2001; Xie et al, 2006). Second, we have assumed that if deformation occurs then microdamage will accumulate, but this could be faulty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Skedros et al (2013) collated secondary osteon size and bone volume data for the rib and various lower limb bones (femora, metatarsals, calcanei, radii, humeri, metacarpals) from a range of human and non-human animals including deer (O. hemionus, O. virginianus), sheep (O. aries), elk (C. elaphus), and black bear (U. americanus) (see Table 1 in Skedros et al 2013 for full details of specimens), to find that bone histological markers and Stewart et al ASI 2020 R2 4 volume did not consistently follow the expectation that metabolic homeostasis is preferentially maintained at the rib. However, rib tissue in the macaque (Macaca fascicularis), when compared against the femur, tibia, and fibula (Lad et al 2019); and in archeological human remains when contrasted against femur, tibia, humerus, metacarpal, occipital bone, pelvis, clavicle, radius, and thoracic vertebrae samples (Fahy et al 2017), did show microscopic evidence for high remodeling trends intra-skeletally. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have yet used histology to evaluate rib vascularity intra-skeletally in a macropod model adapted to habitual bipedal hopping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%