2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-010-9115-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Have Ethical Perceptions Changed? A Comparative Study on the Ethical Perceptions of Turkish Faculty Members

Abstract: This study presents a comparative investigation of ethical perceptions of the faculty members, working in selected departments of Turkish universities. A descriptive research design is used in order to reveal the perceptions regarding the ethical dilemmas related to instruction, research, and outside employment activities in both 2003 and 2008. The set of activities that are considered unethical by faculty members, as well as the occurrence of potential ethical dilemmas are identified on a comparative basis. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chory and Offstein (2018) studied faculty–student relationships and stated that university educators had issues in terms of establishing the boundary line with their students. Burnaz et al (2010) investigated the ethical perceptions of Turkish university instructors. The researchers found out that, due to external employment, university educators neglected some of their responsibilities such as student supervision, absence during office hours, etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chory and Offstein (2018) studied faculty–student relationships and stated that university educators had issues in terms of establishing the boundary line with their students. Burnaz et al (2010) investigated the ethical perceptions of Turkish university instructors. The researchers found out that, due to external employment, university educators neglected some of their responsibilities such as student supervision, absence during office hours, etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitekim Kelly, Bradley ve Demott (2005) Yüksekö¤retimde mesleki etik ilkelerinin yerleflmesi ve yayg›nlaflt›r›lmas› için ö¤retim elemanlar›n›n e¤itim-ö¤retim süre-cinde mesleki etik ilkelere uygun davranarak gelece¤in meslek eleman› ve bilim insan› olarak yetifltirdikleri ö¤rencilerine model olmalar› ve onlar›n da etik düflünme ve davranma becerileri kazanmalar›n› sa¤lamalar› gerekmektedir (Burnaz, Atakan ve Topçu, 2010;Erdem, 2012;Erdem vd, 2014;Gerçek vd., 2011;Gözütok, 1999). Çünkü ö¤renciler birçok konuda oldu¤u gibi, mesleki etik konusunda da ö¤retim elemanlar›n› örnek almaktad›r (Kuther, 2003).…”
Section: Yüksekö¤retim Dergisi | Journal Of Higher Educationunclassified
“…There have been copious studies examining student misconduct (Aslan and Yılmaz, 2021;Jian et al,2018;Thakkar and Weisfeld-Spolter, 2012) or (un)ethical practices in academia including teaching, research and faculty service duties of faculty (Burnaz et al, 2010;Campbell, 2000;Gao et al, 2008;Pelit and Güçer, 2006) and researcher perspectives (Huybers et al, 2020). However, research reflecting university students" views on faculty unethical practices is scarce and the existing ones either examine data on fewer aspects (Dinç and Gizir, 2019) compared to the current study, or adopt a quantitative approach (Ghiațău and Mâță, 2015;Ei and Bowen, 2002;Oldenburg, 2005;Owen and Zwahr-Castro, 2007;Özcan et al, 2013) revealing a limited perspective in a sensitive issue as this and use data from lower levels of education (Uğurlu, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%