2007
DOI: 10.5558/tfc83630-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has the time come to rethink Canada's Crown forest tenure systems?

Abstract: Two important questions are addressed: has the time come to rethink Canada's forest tenure systems; and, if so, what directions might these reforms take? The evolution of Canada's Crown forest tenure systems are described and their role as instruments of public policy are discussed in the context of changing demands on, and attitudes towards, forest resources. The desirable features of a tenure system designed to pursue sustainable forest management (SFM) are presented and current provincial Crown forest tenur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics we examine are consistent with some of the general features of forest tenure systems which are found to be needed for the 21 st century: flexibility, diversity, security, transparency, social legitimacy, timber pricing for efficiency, stewardship, and low regulatory costs (Haley and Nelson 2007). Here we address only the first three featuresflexibility, diversity, security-because they are the main contributors to resilience (explained below).…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The characteristics we examine are consistent with some of the general features of forest tenure systems which are found to be needed for the 21 st century: flexibility, diversity, security, transparency, social legitimacy, timber pricing for efficiency, stewardship, and low regulatory costs (Haley and Nelson 2007). Here we address only the first three featuresflexibility, diversity, security-because they are the main contributors to resilience (explained below).…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…According to Haley and Nelson (2007) and Luckert et al (2011), the forest tenure system is due for fundamental modifications. Further research on the socio-economic impacts of exotic plantations will contribute to this discussion and will help inform Canadian policymakers on appropriate reforms for a forest sector that is more adaptive, more innovative, and perhaps even "more exotic. "…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tenure system is commonly held to be problematic [44,45] and, as recognized by interviewees, it has constrained diversification and innovation by limiting access to fiber for new entrants such as local enterprise, First Nations and communities: "We've got a small log home producer... and we have a fella' out here on the hill making timbers. These guys have a hell of a time getting wood even though [the local] mill brings in wood that is too big for its own facility" (forestry industry).…”
Section: The Case Of Economic Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, these policies emphasize timber harvesting rights (deemphasizing non-timber products) and long-term security for large investors through leases that are renewed every five years. About 80% of annual fiber allocations are associated with large-scale processing facilities that require high minimum fiber volumes to be economically viable, and 100% of the annual cut comes from designated forest areas [44].…”
Section: The Case Of Economic Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%