2018
DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2018.1426382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has the quality of teaching and learning processes improved as a result of the implementation of quality assurance coordinated by the state?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, it brings autonomy and a challenge for leadership effectiveness on the other (Arif et al, 2019). Whatever the perspective, the stakeholders would grant acceptance to quality assurance to takeover; at least the researchers' focus has shifted from the applicability of Quality control tools in higher education to the successful implementation of quality assurance (QA) (Matei & Iwinska, 2016;de Vincenzi, Garau, & Guaglianone, 2018). Kecetep & Özkan (2014) remarked that implementing quality assurance is still lagging behind the targets set initially by the Bologna declaration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, it brings autonomy and a challenge for leadership effectiveness on the other (Arif et al, 2019). Whatever the perspective, the stakeholders would grant acceptance to quality assurance to takeover; at least the researchers' focus has shifted from the applicability of Quality control tools in higher education to the successful implementation of quality assurance (QA) (Matei & Iwinska, 2016;de Vincenzi, Garau, & Guaglianone, 2018). Kecetep & Özkan (2014) remarked that implementing quality assurance is still lagging behind the targets set initially by the Bologna declaration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have evidenced the positive impacts of quality assurance and accreditation. First, in countries without a tradition of course and programme evaluation, quality assurance processes have provided students with opportunities to provide feedback on teaching and other supporting services (Mcdowell & Sambell, 1999;Nguyen & Ta, 2018;Vincenzi, Garau, & Guaglianone, 2018). Second, assessment standards and criteria require higher education institutions to involve stakeholders outside university campuses such as employers and alumni in academic activities, for example, curriculum development.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the implementation of quality assurance and accreditation has resulted in cultural change in leadership and management. Evaluation standards require institutions to periodically evaluate, revise, and amend their core values, missions, visions and strategic planning (Liu & Liu, 2018;Vincenzi et al, 2018). Additionally, improvements in facility management were also observed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as Vietnam, MQA transformed Malaysia's higher education from teacher centered to learners centered outcomes approach from programs compliance well as assist in strengthening internal QA practice. In 2013 MQA embarked on series of programs compliance evaluations to assist the level of compliance and effectiveness of internal QA of higher education and national reference point for all qualifications, and programs evaluation is meant to assist the academic levels and the degree fulfillment of institutions objectives (Vincenzi et al, 2018). Malaysia QA clarifies the qualification level, learning outcomes and credit system based on student learning load associated with the title of a qualification, no programme will be accredited unless it complies with the framework asset in the legislation (MQA, 2018).…”
Section: Qa Framework In Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%