2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has streamflow changed in the Nordic countries? – Recent trends and comparisons to hydrological projections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

22
154
2
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
22
154
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a small, albeit not statistically significant, negative trend in river high flow, indicating a 0.4 % decrease in 10-year flood frequency each decade. This confirms previous findings reported by Wilson et al (2010) showing a decrease in peak flow events in long time series from Sweden, Finland, and parts of Denmark, but an increase in series from western Norway and Denmark. However, the changes we detected by using future climate projections in Sweden were statistically significant (P = 0.05) and, in some cases, of greater magnitude.…”
Section: Changes In High Flows In Swedensupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We found a small, albeit not statistically significant, negative trend in river high flow, indicating a 0.4 % decrease in 10-year flood frequency each decade. This confirms previous findings reported by Wilson et al (2010) showing a decrease in peak flow events in long time series from Sweden, Finland, and parts of Denmark, but an increase in series from western Norway and Denmark. However, the changes we detected by using future climate projections in Sweden were statistically significant (P = 0.05) and, in some cases, of greater magnitude.…”
Section: Changes In High Flows In Swedensupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Classical rainfall droughts, however, will become more severe due to lower summer flows in some regions, e.g. southern and eastern Norway (Feyen and Dankers, 2009;Wilson et al, 2010;Wong et al, 2011;Stahl et al, 2011), which is supported by this study, where the remain-ing droughts in the far future last 14-29 % longer and are 26-52 % more severe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Wilson et al, 2010), and consequently on drought occurrence (PDY, D climates, Table 4). For instance, duration of rain-to-snow-season droughts as identified by Van Loon and Van Lanen (2012) will decrease due to later precipitation as rain in autumn or earlier rain in spring, leading to quicker snowmelt peak.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future climate scenarios generally suggest an increase of precipitation and air temperature in the twenty-first century in Poland and Norway (Madsen et al 2014;Osuch et al 2016). However, there are differences in estimated trends of future flow projections in Europe (Papadimitriou et al 2016;Vautard et al 2016) and in different parts of the world (Wilson et al 2010;Rojas et al 2012;Alfieri et al 2016;Meresa and Gatachew 2016;Kundzewicz et al 2017). The main reasons for those diverse outcomes can be attributed to differences in temporal and spatial scale of rainfall-runoff models applied to transform precipitation into flow, regional and climatic differences, differences in climate projections used as inputs and trend assessment uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%