“…This New York City study provides threshold ground for positing that models of public cooperation in the crime control context can be profitably transferred to the counterterrorism context. The U.S. and the European contexts, however, are different in ways that might influence the dynamics of cooperation (Whitman 2003). Criminal justice procedures and institutions are not the same in the two continents, and the relationship between the Muslim population and dominant social institutions is also not the same.…”
Section: Eliciting Cooperation In Counterterrorism Policingmentioning
This study examines the effects of counterterrorism policing tactics on public cooperation amongst Muslim communities in London, U.K. It tests a procedural justice model developed in the context of studying crime control in the United States. The study reports results of a random-
“…This New York City study provides threshold ground for positing that models of public cooperation in the crime control context can be profitably transferred to the counterterrorism context. The U.S. and the European contexts, however, are different in ways that might influence the dynamics of cooperation (Whitman 2003). Criminal justice procedures and institutions are not the same in the two continents, and the relationship between the Muslim population and dominant social institutions is also not the same.…”
Section: Eliciting Cooperation In Counterterrorism Policingmentioning
This study examines the effects of counterterrorism policing tactics on public cooperation amongst Muslim communities in London, U.K. It tests a procedural justice model developed in the context of studying crime control in the United States. The study reports results of a random-
“…Second, the out-of-scale imprisonment levels in the United States have become acknowledged more widely as an important way in which our crime policies are out of sync with those of many other democracies. This fact, combined with dropping crime, has made it easier to portray the U.S. prison system as unnecessarily large (see Austin et al, 2007;Whitman, 2003).…”
“…directs attention away from variations in the institutional framework through which these forces are mediated in different countries." See also Whitman (2003) and Nelken (2010b). For earlier work that focuses on state processes, see Savelsberg (1994Savelsberg ( , 1999, Barker (2009), Gottschalk (2006), Novak (2008), McLennan (2001McLennan ( , 2008, Wacquant (2009b), and Young (1986).…”
Section: Background and Proximate Causesmentioning
The sociology of punishment has developed a rich understanding of the social and historical forces that have transformed American penality during the last 40 years. But whereas these social forces are not unique to the United States, their penal impact there has been disproportionately large, relative to comparable nations. To address this issue, I suggest that future research should attend more closely to the structure and operation of the penal state. I begin by distinguishing penality (the penal field) from the penal state (the governing institutions that direct and control the penal field). I then present a preliminary conceptualization of “the penal state” and discuss the relationship between the penal state and the American state more generally.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.