Harmonization of domestic legislation in the field of civil law with the European Union law: Securing of claims by means of fiduciary agreements

Pajtić, Bojan

doi:10.5937/zrpfns46-3237

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Игнорирование цели уголовного права при раскрытии содержания принципов грозит серьёзными последствиями. Б. Ристиводжевич, на наш взгляд, убедительно показал, что строгое следование формальным соображениям принципа законности при отказе от телеологии уголовного права создает гораздо больше опасностей для злоупотребления уголовным правом, нежели корректировка самого принципа законности [22].…”

Section: особенности толкования уголовного законаunclassified

Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory

Babayev¹,

Pudovochkin

2022

Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The interpretation of the law in judicial activity, as well as the search for specific features of the interpretation of the criminal law, belong to the category of topics whose relevance in modern conditions is increasing much. The contradiction between the growing criminalization and the increasing concern about the observance of human rights and freedoms actualize the status of interpretation as one of the most important aspects of legal activity, directly ensuring the rule of law in criminal law relations. In any law-making text, there are always a lot of subjective meanings, only one of which can objectively be the basis of a judicial decision. Based on the generalization of the existing approaches to understanding the interpretation of the law, two of its basic models are distinguished - the model of the presentation of the parliamentary meaning and the model of the presentation of the judicial meaning of the law. It is proved that law enforcement is determined precisely by the judicial meaning of the law, the establishment of which in the process of interpretation is a significant component of judicial legal policy. Understanding the meaning of the criminal law has a specificity being predetermined by the public nature of the branch of criminal law, this impresses the course of action of the court within the framework of the implementation of the principle of separation of powers. However, this specificity cannot consist of, as it is commonly considered to be in science, in limiting the methods of interpretation used by the court or establishing a rigid hierarchical sequence in the application of methods of interpretation. The specificity of the interpretation of the criminal law should be determined not by the methods of interpretation, but by the principles of criminal law. Their content, in turn, should be revealed through an appeal to the goals of criminal law regulation. According to the results of the study, the general approach to the interpretation of the criminal law, which being literal as a matter of priority, should combine a restrictive understanding of any legal restrictions and a broad understanding of any defenses against a charge of a crime.

show abstract

Section: особенности толкования уголовного законаunclassified

Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory

Babayev¹,

Pudovochkin

2022

Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Harmonization of domestic legislation in the field of civil law with the European Union law: Securing of claims by means of fiduciary agreements

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory

Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About