2009
DOI: 10.3200/genp.136.3.287-302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harmful Effects of Preexisting Inappropriate Highlighting on Reading Comprehension and Metacognitive Accuracy

Abstract: Previous research has shown that preexisting inappropriate highlighting of text could impair reading comprehension. In addition to replicating this effect, the authors investigated the impact of preexisting highlighting on measures of metacognition. In a 3 x 2 between-subjects factorial design, participants were 180 undergraduate college students randomly assigned to read passages that varied by type of highlighting (none, appropriate, or inappropriate) and text difficulty (low vs. high). Comprehension scores … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…You must have them to get started. Some students prefer used books because they are a bit cheaper, which is fine, but be careful about books that are already highlighted: The book’s previous owner may not have identified the important ideas, and paying attention to poor highlighting can hurt your understanding (Silvers-Gier, Kreiner, & Natz-Gonzalez, 2009).…”
Section: Starting the Semestermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…You must have them to get started. Some students prefer used books because they are a bit cheaper, which is fine, but be careful about books that are already highlighted: The book’s previous owner may not have identified the important ideas, and paying attention to poor highlighting can hurt your understanding (Silvers-Gier, Kreiner, & Natz-Gonzalez, 2009).…”
Section: Starting the Semestermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Easy texts were lower than readers levels and difficult texts higher. Moore et al (2005) and Gier et al (2009) reinforced that manipulation of text difficulty does not affect metacomprehension accuracy in easy and difficult texts, while it is more accurate in texts of medium difficulty. This involves student's focus attention on non-relevant information in both easy and difficult texts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Names for its artifacts (e.g., bookmark, highlight) and the operations learners apply to information (e.g., tag, search, review) were engineered to form an easy-to-understand lexicon describing study tactics, learning strategies, and SRL. Consider highlighting, perhaps the most popular of all study tactics (Gier, Kreiner, & Natz-Gonzalez, 2009; see also Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan & Willingham, 2013). Without delving further into theory about metacognition or findings of learning science about effects of spacing review sessions, learning analytics prompting adaptive variation of studying tactics can be relayed to learners in language they readily understand: I notice you don't usually review information you highlight.…”
Section: Advantages Gained With Nstudymentioning
confidence: 99%