1988
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4534(88)90063-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardness response of YBa2Cu3O7−x

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sakai et al [22] reported a value of 370 GPa for samples prepared by TSMG using a single domain of Sm-123 as a seed [4], and they attributed the difference in E value compared to other published values to the 40% excess of Y-211 phase present in their material. Our results for Y-123 from the different samples, without any doping agents, agree with Johansen [3], Alford et al [6], and Roa et al [2] The Y-211 values for the different samples textured by the Bridgman and TSMG techniques agree with Martínez et al [23].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Sakai et al [22] reported a value of 370 GPa for samples prepared by TSMG using a single domain of Sm-123 as a seed [4], and they attributed the difference in E value compared to other published values to the 40% excess of Y-211 phase present in their material. Our results for Y-123 from the different samples, without any doping agents, agree with Johansen [3], Alford et al [6], and Roa et al [2] The Y-211 values for the different samples textured by the Bridgman and TSMG techniques agree with Martínez et al [23].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…On the other hand, the true hardness H 0 for samples S1, S2, and S3 are 0.741, 0.927, and 1483 GPa, respectively. These values were lower than those reported in the literature [18,26].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Ling and Yan [6] have reported that the microhardness of YBa,Cu,O, increased to the single crystal value 8.73 GPa [7] by doping 10"h Li to the Cu ratio and to 7.75 G P a by doping Zn to the Cu ratio. Anisotropic hardness response of YBa,Cu,O,-, has also been reported by Martinez et al [8]. But to our knowledge, detailed hardness studies on Bi-0 compounds have not yet been initiated.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…where Y is the yield strength, (8) the effect of friction between the indenter and the surface of the sample on the indentation mark is assumed as negligible, since the frictional coefficient is usually of the order of 0.1 to 0.2 [14]. When the friction exists, the indentation pressure P / A , exerted on the surface, is modified [14] to P p' 1 A(1 + pcotb)' (9) where p is the coefficient of friction.…”
Section: Volume Term a mentioning
confidence: 99%