1984
DOI: 10.1515/cclm.1984.22.1.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haptoglobin Typing, is It Clinically Necessary for a Reliable Determination of Haptoglobin with the Single Radial Immunodiffusion Technique?

Abstract: Summary: Over a period of three years we determined haptoglobin levels by single radial immunodiffusion (RID) and the haptoglobin phenotype in over 1700 samples of patients suspected of a haemolytic disease.As haptoglobin phenotyping is rather laborious and therefore an expensive method, we re-evaluated the diagnostic need for phenotyping.From our reference values for the respective phenotypes of haptoglobin it may be theoretically argued that phenotyping is still desirable when the RID value is in the ränge 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on results obtained earlier in our laboratory (14,19,20) and the results obtained in this study, we advocate that phenotyping be performed only when indispensable for clinical purposes, i.e., when the uncorrected Hp value obtained from the RA-1000 is within the range 0.38-0.98 g/L. In this range the decision as regards lowered or normal depends on the phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Based on results obtained earlier in our laboratory (14,19,20) and the results obtained in this study, we advocate that phenotyping be performed only when indispensable for clinical purposes, i.e., when the uncorrected Hp value obtained from the RA-1000 is within the range 0.38-0.98 g/L. In this range the decision as regards lowered or normal depends on the phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Relative molecular mass differs between haptoglobin types (Hp 1-1: M T = 80000, Hp 2-1: M T = 120000, Hp 2-2: M T = 160000). This leads to different diffusion rates between the haptoglobin types which results in an underestimation of Hp 2-2 concentration with the radial immunodiffusion technique (2,4,19). This might explain the lower Hp 1-1 and higher Hp 2-2 concentrations determined by nephelometry in this study compared to studies using radial immunodiftusion (6,7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…7 Initially, the detection of haptoglobin was mainly based on the haptoglobin-haemoglobin binding capacity 28,29 or be measured immunochemically by radial immunodiffusion, immunonephelometric or immunoturbidimetric assays. 30,31 However, the results of these immunochemical methods are often less sensitive and influenced by haptoglobin genotypes. 32 The quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method is proven to be highly sensitive and repeatable, and substantially less time consuming; so that it has been widely used in determining serum haptoglobin concentrations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%