1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9120(87)80006-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the turbidimetric immunoassay of haptoglobin phenotype-dependent?

Abstract: Comparison of the turNdirnetric immunossay of haptoglobin with a reference method (the RID technique with appropriate correction for phenetype) clearly showed the turbidimetric assay to be phenotypedependent. Correction f~ctors for the three main phenotypes were calculated and reference values determined.The observed overall reference range of haptoglobin, irrespective of the phenotype, was 0.56-3.76 g/L. After correction for phenotype, reference values for the three types were: Hp 1-1 : 0.77-2.49; Hp 2-1:0.86… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other possible reason may be that the patient had a phenotype variant of Hp that the method used cannot identify. Studies have shown that the measurement of some phenotypes of Hp by immuno-turbidimetric methods may lead to incorrect results [9]. The previous low Hp level laboratory result of the patient, in spite of a moderate level of anemia and normal hemolysis markers, strengthens this possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other possible reason may be that the patient had a phenotype variant of Hp that the method used cannot identify. Studies have shown that the measurement of some phenotypes of Hp by immuno-turbidimetric methods may lead to incorrect results [9]. The previous low Hp level laboratory result of the patient, in spite of a moderate level of anemia and normal hemolysis markers, strengthens this possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences affect serum levels and they have been related to the lower anti-inflammatory capacity of Hp2 . Different correction factors have been proposed,43 although it is still not clear how exactly the corrections should be applied. Therefore we may be underestimating the real differences between the genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of concentrated antibodies is highly advised to ensure efficient removal of the Hb-Hp complexes in the cases of abnormally high Hp concentrations. Although the polyclonal antibodies used are reactive against the three common Hp phenotypes (1-1, 2-1, and 2-2), some differences in immune reaction related to phenotype must be envisaged (12,13 ). Nevertheless, the efficiency of Hp removal can be validated by checking that the electropherogram is not changed by use of more concentrated antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%