2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0654-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Happiness and Utility in Economic Thought—Or: What Can We Learn from Happiness Research for Public Policy Analysis and Public Policy Making?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature review conducted for this research reveals the intermingling of the terms happiness and quality of life, as they are very closely linked; the same happens with happiness and well-being, in the subjective sense, which are considered equivalent concepts [ 35 ]. Nevertheless, there are some studies that make a clear distinction between quality of life and happiness, using elements such as income to measure quality of life [ 36 ]; others use employment [ 18 , 37 ]; or the residential environment, physical and mental health, education, recreation and leisure, crime or security, and social belonging [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature review conducted for this research reveals the intermingling of the terms happiness and quality of life, as they are very closely linked; the same happens with happiness and well-being, in the subjective sense, which are considered equivalent concepts [ 35 ]. Nevertheless, there are some studies that make a clear distinction between quality of life and happiness, using elements such as income to measure quality of life [ 36 ]; others use employment [ 18 , 37 ]; or the residential environment, physical and mental health, education, recreation and leisure, crime or security, and social belonging [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the works of Krueger and Schkade ( 2008 ) or Hirschauer et al ( 2015 ), the hypothesis we therefore test involves analysing the relationship between individuals’ utility—approximately their satisfaction with life—and economic activity, differentiating rises and falls in the level of aggregate income, and controlling through various relevant personal and institutional categories, as set out in Eq. 3 : where Y ji is the vector of socio-economic aspects of the individual in the country, in which the individual studied resides.…”
Section: Relationship Between Economic Activity and Subjective Well-being: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algunos autores se concentran en las limitaciones de los supuestos del enfoque tradicional para justificar medidas basadas en el enfoque de felicidad (Hirschauer et al, 2015; Oishi y Diener, 2014; Ott, 2010; Tanasescu y Oprean, 2013). Estos autores se basan en la metodología de revisión de la literatura y enfatizan las restricciones del enfoque tradicional en cuanto a la caracterización antropológica de los individuos y, por tanto, de la identificación de capacidades de estos (Becchetti, Massari y Naticchioni, 2014); ideas que retoman de economistas como Amartya Sen. Para Lelkes (2013), la elección de instituciones podría tomar en cuenta su capacidad para mejorar los niveles de felicidad, aun si este no es el propósito último de ellas.…”
Section: Utilidad O Felicidad Como Finesunclassified
“…Por ejemplo, Choudhary, Levine, Mcadam y Welz (2012) establecen comparaciones relativas en la formación de hábitos (consumo y oferta de trabajo), con el propósito de medir los niveles de felicidad. El método de recolección más usado en esta clasificación es la entrevista semiestructurada, en el que juegan un factor importante el autoreconocimiento de la felicidad y la trayectoria personal (Hirschauer et al, 2015). Las relaciones personales parecen estar mejor correlacionadas con mayor bienestar (Schwarze y Winkelmann, 2011).…”
Section: Variables De Características Psicológicasunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation