2019
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1287/1/012049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hands-on experiments in the interactive physics laboratory: A study of students’ intrinsic motivation

Abstract: Experiments in different forms can be suitable tools how to increase students’ interest in physics. However, educators discuss which ways of experimenting are the most beneficial for these purposes. At our department, two different forms of physics experiments are offered to upper secondary students – students’ hands-on experimental work and physics demonstration shows where the students watch experiments conducted by a lecturer. Our research aims primarily at students’ feedback about their immediate attitudes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By allowing students to observe, measure, and analyse real-world phenomena, they gain a deeper understanding of engineering principles. Hands-on learning opportunities and exposure to the dynamic engineering field through the laboratory can significantly enhance student engagement and intrinsic motivation (Snětinová and Kácovský, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By allowing students to observe, measure, and analyse real-world phenomena, they gain a deeper understanding of engineering principles. Hands-on learning opportunities and exposure to the dynamic engineering field through the laboratory can significantly enhance student engagement and intrinsic motivation (Snětinová and Kácovský, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous elements contribute to student achievement and the formation of positive attitudes in a physics course that is perceived as challenging. The instructional activities (Bakaç et al, 2011;Tomara et al, 2017), alternative course materials (Bakri et al, 2020;Wati and Widiansyah, 2020), laboratory activities (Snětinová and Kácovský, 2019;Holmes and Lewandowski, 2020), teacher attitudes (Thibaut et al, 2018;Head et al, 2020;Mami, 2021), and the use of technological opportunities (Civelek et al, 2014;Maulidah and Prima, 2018;Abdusselam and Karal, 2020;Aragaw et al, 2022) are the first of these.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%