2015
DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling Missing Values in Longitudinal Panel Data With Multiple Imputation

Abstract: This article offers an applied review of key issues and methods for the analysis of longitudinal panel data in the presence of missing values. The authors consider the unique challenges associated with attrition (survey dropout), incomplete repeated measures, and unknown observations of time. Using simulated data based on 4 waves of the Marital Instability Over the Life Course Study (n = 2,034), they applied a fixed effect regression model and an event-history analysis with time-varying covariates. They then c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
153
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
153
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We have used this method in previous work17, 18, 19, 25 and in this study because evidence indicates that step values less than 1000 may not represent accurate data capture 26, 27. Five imputations were conducted using the mice package in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), which allows for patient random effects with this data structure 37. The following predictors of missing data were included: study arm, week of study, calendar month, baseline step count, age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, household income, body mass index, days since last cardiac catheterization, most recent ejection fraction, and history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and valvular heart disease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used this method in previous work17, 18, 19, 25 and in this study because evidence indicates that step values less than 1000 may not represent accurate data capture 26, 27. Five imputations were conducted using the mice package in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), which allows for patient random effects with this data structure 37. The following predictors of missing data were included: study arm, week of study, calendar month, baseline step count, age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, household income, body mass index, days since last cardiac catheterization, most recent ejection fraction, and history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and valvular heart disease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However imputation of dependent variables is not recommended (Von Hippel 2007) and imputation of complete waves of missing data in longitudinal analysis has been found to be of doubtful benefit for regression analysis (Young and Johnson 2015). There was very little missing data within available waves for the independent variables used and so there would be no great advantage in using imputation methods for data within waves.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research demonstrates that this method yields less-biased results and more efficient estimates than complete case analysis or other traditional approaches (Young and Johnson 2015;Johnson and Young 2011). Datasets were generated by means of an imputation model, regressing incomplete covariates on the other covariates in the analysis (including interaction terms) and the outcome.…”
Section: Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%