Handling inter-organisational conflict based on bargaining power

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to reveal the effects of an organisation’s bargaining power on its negotiating behaviours (including integrating, obliging, compromising, dominating and avoiding) in the context of inter-organisational conflict in construction projects and investigate how organisational power distance orientation moderates the relationship between the organisation’s bargaining power and its negotiating behaviours. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a questionnaire survey among practitioners in the Chinese construction industry with the final sample consisting of 219 responses. A structural equation model was used to analyse the data and test the hypotheses. Findings The results reveal that an organisation’s bargaining power is positively associated with dominating and integrating behaviours but negatively associated with obliging and avoiding behaviours. Additionally, bargaining power is found to be negatively associated with compromising behaviour when the organisation has a high power distance orientation. Finally, a higher degree of power distance orientation strengthens the positive effect bargaining power has on dominating behaviour. Practical implications The findings can help practitioners to predict the negotiating behaviours of a counterpart according to its bargaining power and the power distance in its organisational culture. This can then enable practitioners to adjust their strategies accordingly and steer the negotiations towards a win–win outcome. Originality/value This study applies the approach-inhibition theory of power to inter-organisational negotiations and empirically tests the relationship between an organisation’s bargaining power and its negotiating behaviours in the context of construction projects. Additionally, this study reveals that organisational power distance orientation moderates this relationship.

Jokes and quarrels: a cross-cultural investigation of humor and conflict transformation in groups

“…Another notable result concerns the higher scores for relationship conflict reported by Romanian groups as compared to the Dutch ones. To some extent, these results are aligned with the ones reported by Lu, Wei and Wang (2020) showing that high power asymetry is associated with increased relationship conflict. It is likely that Romanian groups operate in organizations in which power asymetry is higher than in Dutch organizations, and such concentration of power could trigger more relationship conflict.…”

Project-Based Organizations’ Pursuit of Production Efficiency and Legitimate Power: An Institutional Perspective

“…Chinese culture is characterized by collectivism, high power distance, and long-term orientation. Under the influence of such a culture, the transaction parties attach great importance to solidarity and long-term relationships in the transaction (Lu et al, 2020). When the owner’s status is high, the contractor tends to comply with the owner’s instructions without revolt and regard these instructions as the PBO’s legitimate power.…”

Outflankers or outflanked? Investigating the concept of organizational outflanking through power, its forms, levels and practise

“…This has tended to focus on either third-party intervention by managers in subordinate conflicts (Kozan et al, 2007;Kozan et al, 2014) or conflict avoidance between subordinates and their managers (Tjosvold and Sun, 2002;Wang, 2006;Xu, 2009). The majority of the research focuses on the Chinese (Xu, 2009;Tjosvold and Sun, 2002;Lu et al, 2020) or Turkish context (Kozan et al, 2007;Kozan et al, 2014), with one additional study looking at comparative differences in conflict avoidance between Chinese and American participants (Friedman et al, 2006). Looking more closely at this research, in the Turkish context, research has explored managers' intervention in subordinate conflicts within Turkish organizations.…”

“…It was shown that third parties play a significant role in preserving the face of adversaries. Looking at another collectivist culture, Lu et al (2020) similarly suggest that those from a low-power party may adopt outflanking as a strategy for avoiding conflict rather than resolving the disagreement immediately. The study highlighted how in the Chinese context, negotiators in the low-power party may try to interact with superiors to request intervention to resolve conflicts.…”