The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.4337/9781849809047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handbook on Multi-level Governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is so because in such multilevel government and governance contexts (Hooghe & Marks, 2003), different levels of government are likely to have some common, but also different goals and instrument preferences (Enderlein, Wälti, & Zürn, 2011). These mixes have rarely been studied from a policy integration perspective and the two cases studies presented below illustrate the kinds of mechanisms which have been used, both successfully and unsuccessfully, in two of these efforts.…”
Section: Enhancing Integration In Instrument Mixes: Understanding Vermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is so because in such multilevel government and governance contexts (Hooghe & Marks, 2003), different levels of government are likely to have some common, but also different goals and instrument preferences (Enderlein, Wälti, & Zürn, 2011). These mixes have rarely been studied from a policy integration perspective and the two cases studies presented below illustrate the kinds of mechanisms which have been used, both successfully and unsuccessfully, in two of these efforts.…”
Section: Enhancing Integration In Instrument Mixes: Understanding Vermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kohler-Koch and Larat (2009) have explored the diversity of research traditions in Europe and how MLG had been used in national research. Enderlein, Wälti and Zürn's (2010) 31-chapter edited 'handbook' has examined MLG from domestic and EU perspectives, but also regarding comparative regionalism and global governance. Bache and Andreou (2011) have uncovered nascent and emerging patterns of MLG across South-East Europe.…”
Section: Mlg Since Maastricht: Where Does It Come From? What Is It?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideas of cosmopolitan democracy thereby address social geography beyond country containers and collective identities beyond nations (Fraser, 2009;Habermas, 2001;Linklater, 1998). These conceptions also acknowledge regulatory processes beyond states, for example, with notions of 'multi-level governance ' (Bache and Flinders, 2004;Enderlein et al, 2010) and aspirations for world government (Cabrera, 2010b;Craig, 2008;Tännsjö, 2008).…”
Section: Modern Cosmopolitanism and Its Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the holistic and relational term is invoked rather than 'multi-level', with its connotations of separate and hierarchically arranged tiers (Bache and Flinders, 2004;Enderlein et al, 2010). Public policy is today generally handled through networks that interconnect agencies with respective global, macroregional, national, micro-regional and local jurisdictions and constituencies.…”
Section: Transscalaritymentioning
confidence: 99%