2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-444-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handbook of Evidence-Based Psychodynamic Psychotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatedly, the cognitive avoidance model for treating anxiety disorders takes a similar approach by suggesting that clients with anxiety disorders should be therapeutically exposed to their worries. CBT based on the cognitive avoidance model significantly reduces anxiety and worry when compared to short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (Leichsenring, 2009). Planned exposure within a therapeutic environment may reduce the client's experience of uncontrollability, and additionally may reduce the negative valence of the thoughts through the repeated experience of having catastrophic thinking disconfirmed.…”
Section: Exposure and Response Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatedly, the cognitive avoidance model for treating anxiety disorders takes a similar approach by suggesting that clients with anxiety disorders should be therapeutically exposed to their worries. CBT based on the cognitive avoidance model significantly reduces anxiety and worry when compared to short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (Leichsenring, 2009). Planned exposure within a therapeutic environment may reduce the client's experience of uncontrollability, and additionally may reduce the negative valence of the thoughts through the repeated experience of having catastrophic thinking disconfirmed.…”
Section: Exposure and Response Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AB saw the therapeutic relationship as central to psychotherapy, believing that the therapist's "limited reparenting" stance allowed the patient to progress therapeutically by feeling accepted and valued (Young, 1994;Young et al, 2003). She thereby shared a belief that is widespread across psychotherapeutic professions, anchored in Rogerian principles of empathy and trust and supported by evidence that the strength of the therapeutic relationship is the best predictor of psychotherapy outcome (Martin, Garske & Davis, 2000;Safran et al, 2009). Therefore, AB actively fostered a therapeutic relationship before starting therapy, even making this the focus of initial sessions consistent with the view, widespread across different therapies, that the therapist should develop the relationship in parallel to delivering therapy.…”
Section: Re-assessing the Therapeutic Relationship As A Mechanism Fmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…On completion of her clinical psychology doctoral training in the UK, AB used an integrative approach. She drew particularly on cognitive behavioural therapy (Beck, Rush, Shaw & Emery, 1979), schema focused therapy (Young, 1994;Young, Klosko & Weishaar, 2003), and aspects of psychodynamic psychotherapy (Freud, 1940;Safran, Muran & Proskurov, 2009), particularly the "inner child" concept (Capacchione, 1991) and ideas of transference and countertransference (Jones, 2004). Drawing on different therapeutic models within a single session was also standard practice.…”
Section: The Professional and Clinical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it was designed as a naturalistic field study on the psychodynamic therapy of emerging adults, without a nontreatment control group. Although the naturalistic design facilitates optimization of external validity, as it reflects the reality of clinical work with clients in public clinics more accurately (Levy & Ablon, 2009), the lack of a comparison group makes it impossible to rule out the possibility that all gains could be true effects of developmental maturation rather than treatment effects. However, effect sizes of decrease of symptoms were twice that reported for waiting list controls (Leichsenring, Rabung, & Leibing, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%