2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures

Abstract: except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaption, computer software, or similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Produc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The participants' functioning assessment was measured using a modified version of a generic assessment instrument for health and disability developed as part of a WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) [18]. This instrument consists of ten items asking questions about five domains: mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, participation, and cognition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants' functioning assessment was measured using a modified version of a generic assessment instrument for health and disability developed as part of a WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) [18]. This instrument consists of ten items asking questions about five domains: mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, participation, and cognition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adapted survey was reviewed by two orthopaedic surgeons and six lay people and approved within this study institution for dissemination. The survey consists of nine statements for the patient to rank on a five-point Likert scale, followed by four further questions with yes/no answers and finally a space for further comments [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFA is a statistical procedure for multi-variation which is used to check that how better the variables are measured according to the understanding of the researcher regarding the nature of those particular constructs. In short, the main objective of CFA is to test that either the data fits into the hypothetical model of measurement or not (Preedy & Watson, 2009). While conducting CFA, the items whose values are ≥ 0.7 are taken under notice for data collection items.…”
Section: Statistical Treatment Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%